GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
13:40 Nov 24, 2014 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Marketing - Marketing / Market Research / Consultancy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Judith Armele Mexico Local time: 05:37 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Discussion entries: 5 | |
---|---|
if guilt is cleared based on the donation Explanation: On the amount that is donated |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Calculate guilt as a function of Explanation: What would happen if we calculate guilt as a function of donation in the above equation? Entiendo que la ecuación sería algo como a mayor culpa mayor donación y la pregunta está manejando la opción de calcular la culpa. En matemáticas cuando se despeja la x de una ecuación se está calculando su valor. Para estar segura que este es el significado sería bueno ver lo anterior y cómo está planteada la ecuación. Si ese no fuera el sentido yo utilizaría remove: remove guilt as a function of donation from the above equation. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
find guilt based on the donation (function) Explanation: I think the author is saying that donations are a function of guilt. So we need to find guilt based on the things we know in the donation function, where the donation is a function of guilt. I think that is what the maths in the original text say, rather than the other way around. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.