GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11:49 Sep 22, 2016 |
Dutch to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Human Resources / Contract between the government and educational staff | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Marijke Singer Spain Local time: 00:48 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | In theory yes |
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
In theory yes Explanation: However, I think they are trying to make a distinction between an employment contract that contains everything related to the job and the employee and a contract that lists the minimum terms that the law (or, in your case, the collective bargaining agreement) prescribes. See: http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/employment-contracts.html Why have an employment contract? An employer must provide an employee with their employment terms, (known as a "statement of terms") within 2 months of the employee's start date. However, a statement of terms is the bare minimum required by law, and does not protect employers properly. That is why an employment contract is much better for both employers and employees. A comprehensive contract of employment allows an employer to specify an employee's duties and responsibilities - so an employee knows exactly what is expected of them. See below for what should be included. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.