GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23:29 Aug 13, 2001 |
Dutch to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Dave Greatrix United Kingdom Local time: 16:13 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
the investments made by him ( in the amount of ...) Explanation: None needed. Norstedts |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
XXX never received compensation for the 'conversion costs', Explanation: let alone for his/her/its investment of NLG 14,874.63. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
xxx was never compensated for his 'conversion costs' not to mention his investment of f14.874.63 Explanation: Is this a building dispute. It seems that 'ombouwkosten' was a cost incurred to put work right that had been carried out badly or incorrectly, in which case conversion costs would not be suitable. Restitution or reinstatement costs possibly. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.