11:00 Jan 9, 2003 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Bus/Financial / Fund report (fixed invome) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Ralf Lemster Germany Local time: 21:52 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | avoid underperformance |
| ||
4 | See explanation |
|
See explanation Explanation: Johannah Here's how I would interpret this terrible piece of writing :-). If money market (mmkt) rates are plotted against time to maturity that creates a curve. Normally this curve will start low for short-term rates and rise for medium and long-term rates. Sometimes it may be inverted, which usually means that it starts high in the short-term and falls in the longer term. Though it can also mean that the graph has gone from being convex to concave, i.e. the location of the steep part of the curve has changed. I'd rather hope that your fund manager has published these graphs in his report for you. So what he is saying is that rather than take a firm position on how rates will change in the future by going to cash (ready to invest if rates go up) or buying long-term instruments (to be protected against a fall), he is arranging the portfolio in a 'neutral' way so that on average the funds will be available in 30-40 days allowing him to respond to how the markets are moving, and avoiding buying instruments for a maturity for which the rates are particularly low. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
avoid underperformance Explanation: Following your earlier questions, I take it we're talking about a UK money market fund. Have a look at the structure of the UK yield curve at the very short end (see the URL below for the Libor fixings determined and published by the British Bankers' Association - rates of this morning): 2 wks 3.99375% 1 mth 3.97484% 2 mths 3.97609% 3 mths 3.97609% 6 mths 3.96297% 9 mths 3.94969% 1 year 3.96484% As you can see, the interest rate structure is "inverted" - you get less interest for a 6-month deposit tha, say, for a 2-week or 1-month deposit. (I'm not going into the reasons for this here - contact me via my profile page if you need more background.) I would assume that for this very reason, the fund focused its investments on the 30-to-40-day range rather than 3 to 6 months. HTH - best regards, Ralf -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2003-01-09 11:37:37 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- ...and BTW I don\'t find it particularly terrible - that\'s market speak for you... ;-)=) |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.