22:30 Nov 14, 2013 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Electronics / Elect Eng | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 10:51 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | output |
|
output Explanation: Is fine — though it's not very elegant EN! Here, it is the verb 'to output' — literally, of course, the subject is not going to be actually outputting anything themselves, but this is typical engineers' style, when what they really mean is 'set the output level to be...' -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 7 hrs (2013-11-15 05:49:07 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Of course, Asker, your question is ambiguous: 'output' appears TWICE in b) The first 'output' is a verb, and as such, does not require 'power' with it. The second 'output power' is perfectly correct — it would be OK to omit the 'output', but the 'power' must remain (unless, of course, you leave out both, in which case the phrase would be understandable if it ended after RF. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||