Apr 4, 2008 04:42
16 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term
pollution
English
Science
Environment & Ecology
I need an English term that covers noise pollution, light pollution, vibration, etc. all in one word or short term (as distinct from pollution by substances or materials).
Responses
4 +3 | undesirable effects | Gillian Scheibelein |
4 +4 | contamination | Jack Dunwell |
4 | negative environmental effects | KanTrans |
3 | spoilage | hamani56 (X) |
3 | disturbance | Max Nuijens |
Responses
+3
1 hr
Selected
undesirable effects
I'd rewrite and then define what these "effects" are. Vibration is certainly not pollution (or contamination for that matter).
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+4
14 mins
contamination
'though I think "pollution" covers as best it can
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Carla_am
19 mins
|
Thanks perfectionist!
|
|
agree |
Phong Le
35 mins
|
Thanks Phong Le
|
|
agree |
Sara Mullin
1 hr
|
Thanks renne
|
|
neutral |
Sheila Wilson
: I would have thought that contamination best described the types of pollution the asker wanted excluded
13 hrs
|
Evening Sheila I don't think asker has excluded anything except separate answers?
|
|
agree |
Pham Huu Phuoc
1 day 9 hrs
|
Thanks Tan Son Nhi!
|
1 hr
spoilage
in the absence of context, it's difficult to determine the appropriateness of a word.
2 hrs
disturbance
I found noise disturbance, and it seems light- and vibration disturbance also may apply.
Think of a wind turbine that produces noise, shadow, and air turbulence or vibration. Perhaps this is a possible context?
Think of a wind turbine that produces noise, shadow, and air turbulence or vibration. Perhaps this is a possible context?
21 hrs
negative environmental effects
Things we do in the environment cause "environmental effects". They my be positive, negative, or neutral (rarely so). Noise is a measurable effect as is light, and vibration. Whether they are positive or negative depends on the context of the actual effect.
Something went wrong...