04:33 Jul 17, 2018 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 18:30 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | but |
| ||
4 | no longer |
|
no longer Explanation: I think this is what it is. prompted them to be less generous to Rokia, but no longer generous to everyone else in Mali. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 8 mins (2018-07-17 04:41:46 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The next part is the clue for my answer: The students’ reaction is typical of how most of us feel when we are confronted with problems like poverty. Our first instinct is to be gen erous, especially when facing an imperiled seven-year-old girl. But, like the Penn students, our second thought is often that there is really no point: Our contribution would be a drop in the bucket, -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 9 mins (2018-07-17 04:42:34 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- You can see what they say: Our first instinct is to be generous But our second thought is often that there is really no point. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 11 mins (2018-07-17 04:44:43 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- So it prompted them to be less generous to Rokia, and even more it prompted them to be not generous anymore to everyone else in Mali. |
| |||||||||||||
1 hr confidence: peer agreement (net): +3
|