11:35 Feb 19, 2007 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Medical - Medical (general) / allergy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Dr Sue Levy (X) Local time: 13:51 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +2 | risk of food allergies persisting |
| ||
3 +2 | to give an idea of the relative persistence of allergies to solid foods |
| ||
3 +1 | my understanding... |
| ||
3 -1 | "In order to understand how an allergy is widespread in the host... |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
to indicate the persistence of food allergies to solid foods... my understanding... Explanation: The persistence of allergies to solid foods can be estimated from their duration. However, I would have thought this was self-evident! Does the author define "persistence" and duration"? They're obviously intended as two different concepts. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
to indicate the persistence of food allergies to solid foods... "In order to understand how an allergy is widespread in the host... Explanation: "In order to understand how an allergy is widespread in the host, we can consider the duration of the allergy itself" That is how I read it Ale |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
to indicate the persistence of food allergies to solid foods... to give an idea of the relative persistence of allergies to solid foods Explanation: Agree with Marie-Helene: it is sort of stating the obvious - I suppose indicating how general conclusions can be drawn, such as "milk allergies are more persistent than egg allergies" (...because in various studies milk allergies lasted longer). -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2007-02-19 14:02:21 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I should have put "relative" in brackets. |
| |||||||||||||||||
4 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +2
|