KudoZ home » English to Indonesian » Government / Politics

international relation

Advertisement

Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs
(or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
10:44 Sep 18, 2001
English to Indonesian translations [Non-PRO]
Social Sciences - Government / Politics
English term or phrase: international relation
1. Paradigm Dominance in international relations : The development of International Relations as a social Science

The concern of this study is admittedly narrow; it is focused on the issue of how International Relations has developed as a social science. Withinthat general focus it is concerned specifically with the dominance of a US view of the subject as a social scince. Of course, such definition of International Relation theory is partial, and certainly many would reason why US views of the subject have dominated the broad development of paradigms within the discipline. This issue has crucial relevance for any understanding of the evolution oh the dicipline, and for any possinility of inter-paradigm debate. My broad argument will bw two-fold : on the one hand, the US view of International Relations as a social science has led to the subject strongly reflecting US policy conserns; on the other, this US concern with policy relevance has made it very difficult for the subject to envolve on a cross national, cumulative basis. Both of these factors make the task make the task of paradigm confrontation even more complex than is implied by those philosophers of social science who have taken the concept of paradigm to imply an essentially relativistic epistemology. After outlining the development of the subject as a social science, this study will discuss the existence of a US dominance of the dicipline, then conclude with an examination of the implications for the inter-paradigm debate.
We should start our survey of the development of paradigms in International Relations by nothing that although it is unquestionable that the subject has developed as a social science in ways that, broadly speaking, parallel (albeit with a lag) the development of other social science, it is by no means as clear that International Relations as social science dominates the ways in which the subject is studied.
Robert
Advertisement


Summary of answers provided
5 +1Hubungan Internasionaldonnyboy
3 -2Perhubungan internasionalJH Trads


Discussion entries: 1





  

Answers


15 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5 peer agreement (net): -2
Perhubungan internasional


Explanation:
This would fit this context

JH Trads
United States
Local time: 21:15
Native speaker of: Native in SpanishSpanish, Native in FrenchFrench

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
disagree  Alief Yahya: 'Hubungan Internasional' is the right answer. Agree with donnyboy
2 hrs
  -> thanks

disagree  Catherine Muir: Should be 'hubungan', not 'perhubungan'. 'per-an' indicates a process, not a result.
7 hrs
  -> thanks
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 hr   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5 peer agreement (net): +1
Hubungan Internasional


Explanation:
1. Dominasi paradigma Hubungan Internasional (=HI): Perkembangan Hubungan-Internasional sebagai suatu ilmu sosial

Lingkup kajian ini diakui memang terbatas; Kajian ini dititik-beratkan pada masalah bagaimana HI telah berkembang sebagai suatu ilmu sosial. Dalam titik-berat umum itu, lingkup khususnya adalah mengenai dominasi pandangan Amerika Serikat (=AS) pada HI sebagai suatu ilmu sosial. Tentu saja, definisi teori HI seperti itu akan berat sebelah, dan tentunya banyak yang akan bertanya-tanya mengapa pandangan AS mengenai hal tersebut telah mendominasi perkembangan luas dari paradigma dalam disiplin ilmu tersebut. Masalah ini memiliki pengaruh penting terhadap segala pemahaman mengenai evolusi dari disiplin ilmu tersebut, dan terhadap segala kemungkinan perdebatan antar-paradigma. Pemikiran saya terdiri dari dua hal : Di satu pihak, Pandangan AS terhadap HI sebagai suatu ilmu sosial telah membuat HI menjadi sangat mencerminkan kepentingan kebijakan AS; di lain pihak, kepentingan AS ini dengan kaitan politiknya telah membuat HI tersebut menjadi sangat sulit untuk berevolusi atas dasar pengumpulan sumbangan pikiran antar bangsa. Kedua faktor ini berakibat upaya pembandingan paradigma menjadi jauh lebih rumit daripada yang disiratkan oleh para filsuf ilmu sosial yang menganggap paradigma sebagai suatu epistemologi yang pada dasarnya bersifat relatif/nisbi. Setelah menjabarkan garis besar perkembangan HI sebagai suatu ilmu sosial, kajian ini akan membahas adanya dominasi AS pada disiplin ilmu tersebut, yang kemudian akan diakhiri dengan suatu telaah mengenai implikasinya pada perdebatan antar-paradigma.
Kita sebaiknya memulai pembahasan kita mengenai perkembangan paradigma dalam HI, dengan mencatat bahwa walaupun tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa HI telah berkembang sebagai suatu ilmu sosial dengan cara yang, secara umum dapat dikatakan, sejajar (meski agak tertinggal) dengan perkembangan ilmu sosial lainnya, tidaklah terlihat jelas bahwa HI sebagai suatu ilmu sosial mendominasi cara-cara pengkajian HI tersebut.

donnyboy
Indonesia
Local time: 10:15

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Erich Ekoputra
1888 days
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)




Voters for reclassification
as
PRO / non-PRO
PRO (1): Erich Ekoputra


Return to KudoZ list


Changes made by editors
Nov 20, 2006 - Changes made by Erich Ekoputra:
FieldOther » Social Sciences
Field (specific)(none) » Government / Politics


KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.



See also:



Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search