French term
dé-hiérarchisation des prises de parole
Les espaces électroniques se structurent donc en territoires qui chacun génèrent des usages, des codes et des modes relationnels qui leur sont propres. J.-F. Lyotard analysera ceci à partir de l’hypothèse postmoderne, montrant l’érosion subie par les grands discours d’explication du monde et emportant avec eux les autorités et les légitimités institutionnelles. Ceci s’illustrera particulièrement comme l’expression de la dé-hiérarchisation des prises de parole.
I understand the general idea (that just about anyone can start a blog and rant on and on), but any suggestions on how to render this a bit more elegantly?
Thank you in advance!
Jan 30, 2007 12:21: Charlie Bavington changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): Jocelyne S, Miranda Joubioux (X), Charlie Bavington
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
democratization of discourse/communication/discussion/expression
moving away from the right to speak out being linked to status
A difficult one to render in a way that is both concise and natural. Happy for anyone to improve upon this initial effort.
agree |
Emma Paulay
: right to speak out is best, I think
40 mins
|
Thanks, Emma
|
|
agree |
Marc Glinert
: I think we're singing from the same hymn book here, Rob, but it's hard to express it neatly
2 hrs
|
Thanks Marc - it is indeed
|
destructuring of the voicing of opinion.
unstructured discussion
If you buy into that idea, I would imagine you're quite able to come up with several suitable options, the above is just to illustrate the concept (!). Not sure whether the plural for "prises de p." is intended to indicate one person rambling on (in which case "discussion" might not fit) or several people taking turns - if it IS only about blogs, then perhaps the former and perhaps discussion not so good.
Anyway, it was the idea of focusing on the result, not the process, that I wanted to put forward....
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2007-01-30 12:23:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
also - informal, unfettered (!), random, ... you name it.
AND I did NOT vote for reclassification...
neutral |
Marc Glinert
: it's not so much the structure (or lack of structure) in the discussion Charlie, as far as I can make out, as the status of those taking part//I never read the explanation boxes!! only kidding, thanks Charlie
50 mins
|
As I said, my main point was to suggest that translating the end-result, rather than the process, might prove more fruitful. But putting "see below" as the headline is frowned upon, so I just put the 1st idea I had.
|
freeing from precedence
regardless of position or status
...would be my stab at this one Sylvia.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2007-01-30 13:22:02 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
ok I missed the de-, so make that:
" ...new-found right of...."
Something went wrong...