classés en Code du Travail

10:48 Oct 16, 2018 

Just close and also just "yes" for yes, just "no" for no !.How it comes that a translation site for professional translators can't find a translation for terms!!!.

09:25 Oct 15, 2018 

we will ever agree that we disagree ...

10:34 Oct 14, 2018 

Hello Daryo

Slavishly literal translation???

Forgive me for translating "Code du Travail" as "Labour Code" and for not accepting your "omission".

Regards

05:03 Oct 14, 2018 

"fire regulations pertaining to the workplace"

needs to be reread 3 times to understand it?

at the difference from the ST (or the slavishly literal translation)

05:06 Oct 13, 2018 

And you think that by taking out the "Labour Code", the leasee of the offices is going to understand "à la première lecture" that his staff have to comply with it???

01:40 Oct 13, 2018 

le problème est que c'est celui qui lit la traduction qui doit piger - de préférence à la première lecture.

22:08 Oct 11, 2018 

If you look at a website like Préventica,

https://www.preventica.com/dossier-securite-incendie-regleme...

you will see a heading

Une réglementation à 3 temps

and the second part is

Le Code du Travail, lui, énonce les obligations des usagers des lieux de travail vis-à-vis des équipements, de l’organisation de l’évacuation et de la formation des salariés.

So to know how to run the premises as an office classified in the Code du Travail, you have to look at the....... Code du Travail

That's why it's vital to mention the Code du Travail in the lease as all the occupants using it as an office have to comply with the....Code du Travail

piges?

20:17 Oct 11, 2018 

these premises are offices / the workplace for office workers - *as opposed to being something else*.

That's the key point. Not some roundabout coded messages about "classification". And the reason why "Code du travail" was mentioned at all.

There is not much point mentioning "Code du travail" if it's done in a way that the relevance of that mention is lost - has to be guessed.

05:04 Oct 10, 2018 

Hello Nathalie

Yes, I understand what you mean. My translation is "good" but the reader would need to apply some knowledge of the French system or powers of deduction. Nonetheless, in a French contract, even translated, it's a safe bet and makes reference to a French legal act that applies to this very contract, whether written in English or French, so I'd go with it personally.
Daryo, who is critical of everyone as you can see, misses the whole point and does not refer to this important piece of legislation which IS given in the French in his own answer.

Regards
SafeTex

01:32 Oct 9, 2018 

providing "a clear and understandable translation" [and an accurate one!], what exactly would be the translator's job?? And how could you manage that if you haven't got a clue about what the text really means? Would be very interested to learn it ... never too late.

A propos "classified information" it's in fact a kind of euphemism / the shortened version of "classified as secret", IOW it's by no mean an indication of the primary meaning of "classify/classified", which is "being put in a defined class / being categorised as".

07:45 Oct 8, 2018 

If you want a more detailed explanation of the meaning/use of classé in this context, you'd be better off posting this as a French monolingual question.

21:04 Oct 7, 2018 

Thanks SafeTex and philgoddard, this gives me some clues but I do think it is the translator's job to provide a clear and understandable translation. Just "classified" on its own seems to me incomplete and mysterious. Classified as what? Under what? Per what? The only kind of "classified" I know of, without further specification, would be "classified information" (military secrets etc.).

I see now that in the French Labor Code, different types of buildings have different kinds of fire regulations attached to them. OK. I will think further along those lines.