pied gyroscopique OR tête de gyro

English translation: half-bowl head

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
French term or phrase:tête de gyro
English translation:half-bowl head
Entered by: Katherine Hodkinson

20:06 Aug 6, 2006
French to English translations [PRO]
Tech/Engineering - Photography/Imaging (& Graphic Arts) / video camera equipment
French term or phrase: pied gyroscopique OR tête de gyro
both referring to the same object, for use with a movie camera.

"C'est une sorte de grosse boule qu'on met entre le pied et le caméra, pour que ça tourne bien dans tous les sens."

TIA
Katherine Hodkinson
United Kingdom
Local time: 20:44
ball head
Explanation:
From the description, it's not a real gyro stabilizer.

http://www.shortcourses.com/equipment/tripods/2-lheads.htm
Selected response from:

Dr Sue Levy (X)
Local time: 21:44
Grading comment
Many thanks to both of you for your help. I've gone for half-bowl head and levelling tripod for the different instances - they seem quite clear descriptive terms, for what is essentially not a technical text. But hopefully appropriate too!
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4 +1ball head
Dr Sue Levy (X)
4COMMENT only, NFG
Tony M


Discussion entries: 5





  

Answers


13 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +1
ball head


Explanation:
From the description, it's not a real gyro stabilizer.

http://www.shortcourses.com/equipment/tripods/2-lheads.htm

Dr Sue Levy (X)
Local time: 21:44
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 12
Grading comment
Many thanks to both of you for your help. I've gone for half-bowl head and levelling tripod for the different instances - they seem quite clear descriptive terms, for what is essentially not a technical text. But hopefully appropriate too!

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Tony M: This is indeed a possibility, but note that THIS type of head is normally only used for STILLS cameras, and NOT movie cameras, as Katherine has asked / Yes, I think it's a head with ball leveller; they WERE heavy!
48 mins
  -> Hi Tony! it's a video camera apparently - see heading - come to think of it, they're probably referring to a half-ball or half-bowl head
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

11 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5
COMMENT only, NFG


Explanation:
I feel sure Sue's answer is right in general, but I just wanted to add a couple of extra comments for the sake of completeness.

1) It would appear that the term 'gyro' here is being used rather imprecisely; there are such things as gyroscopic lenses for image stabilization etc., but apart from the fact that this would be a fairly unlikely piece of equipment to be humping up a mountain, in any case, they were only just about coming into use in the mate 70s, so probably a bit late for this context.

3) Katherine mentions the 2 different terms being used to refer to the same thing; the explanation for this is simple: professional tripods come in 2 parts — a set of 'legs' that have a sort of 'bowl' at the top; and a 'head' that has a rounded base and a big screw to tighten it. This rounded base fits into the bowl and can be oriented accurately, so that the head itself can be levelled, even though the legs themselves may be on uneven ground and not perfectly level. This sort of arrangement is almost essential when using a pan-and-tilt head, where the functions of levelling the camera and moving the camera need to be separate (unlike for stills). Back in the 70s, one of the few 'fluid heads' used professionally (the first to be patented) was made by Miller, and in those days both heads and tripods were pretty heavy (before carbon fibre and other materials advances). When using an old film camera, usually much heavier than a modern, compact video camera, a sturdy tripod and pan-and-tilt head capable of controlling such a heavy load were essential.

4) The 'ball head' proper, as described in the link proposed by Sue, is mainly reserved for stills camera use, or amateur video. The reason is simple: although it allows great flexibility and speed in levelling/positioning the camera, the disadvantage is that one locking device unlocks the head in all directions; so if you want to use it for movie work, i order to be able to do a pan, you have to unlock it, which means it goes all floppy in the tilt direction too, which is extremely difficult to cope with for serious work; traditionally, they have never really been strong enough either to support the greater weight of a film camera.



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 hrs (2006-08-07 07:18:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Apologies for the typo: "late 70s", of course, and for getting my numbering wrong. Sorry, didn't sleep much last night! :-((

Tony M
France
Local time: 21:44
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 128
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search