GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10:08 Dec 14, 2010 |
French to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Psychology | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Cleartrans Belgium Local time: 06:31 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | reframing |
| ||
3 | rebuttal |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
rebuttal Explanation: It seems to be about debating. The link below gives the different stages of debating in english. Reference: http://www.actdu.org.au/archives/actein_site/basicskills.htm... Reference: http://communicationcitoyenne.over-blog.com/article-28759577... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
reframing Explanation: Changing the frame leads to a different conclusion. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day1 hr (2010-12-15 11:57:01 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Philippe Breton: * "[...] The analysis was mainly based on the categories proposed by Philippe Breton (2006, [1996]), following Perelman's works (1970 [1958]), in his attempt to classify and examine argument techniques (authority, community, framing and analogy, along with their sub-categories) [...]", in Debating the EU Constitution in France: Promises and pitfalls of a European future, Journal of Language and Politics. * La notion de cadre, in http://tiny.cc/dwa7m Reference: http://changingminds.org/principles/framing.htm Reference: http://changingminds.org/techniques/general/reframing.htm |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.