Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
You're right Gert. It is quite obvious, really, but it's been a long day and I didn't immediately realise that the lawyer's name was not included in the text!! 4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer
Thanks, juliebarba. That's more or less how I read it, but in the source text as above, that translation seems a bit odd to me, which is really why I posted the question. I suspect that there may be a legalese way of expressing this.
Incidentally, this is the FIRST part of the text (not the FINAL part). Apologies for this typo!