12:03 Aug 5, 2004 |
French to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 18:07 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
I think it is the 'interprétation' of the legislation that has been given... Explanation: ...in an earlier decision from the 'Upper Chamber' (or whatever...) It seems to me this makes most sense: an earlier decision has established a certain interpretation of the legislation that can thenceforth be quoted as a precedent; therefore, when the 'chamber' finds itself at odds with this previous interpretation, it needs to refer back to the upper Chamber for clarification, etc. I would not expect it to be the 'Upper chamber' that is giving the legislation itself, only the interpretation of it.... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||