GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
09:32 Aug 24, 2001 |
French to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Evert DELOOF-SYS Belgium Local time: 18:46 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na +2 | redundancy |
| ||
na +1 | redundancy for economic reasons |
| ||
na +1 | layoff (US) or redundancy(UK) |
| ||
na -1 | dismissal for economic reasons |
| ||
na -1 | layoff for economic reasons |
|
dismissal for economic reasons Explanation: Absolutely correct. Ref.(via www.google.com): The Fourth Study Commission, which was created at the Athens Congress in October 1994 and had its first meeting in Tunis in September 1995, received 23 reports from members coming from the following countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Luxembourg, Morocco, Norway, Republic of China (Taiwan), Romania, Senegal, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia, United Kingdom. The subject discussed was "Dismissal for economic reasons". A questionnaire was previously distributed to the members of the Commission. From the different reports it emerged that although dismissal for economic reasons is taken into account by the majority of national legislations, in certain countries this type of dismissal is part of the general regulations dealing with legal grounds for dismissal, while in a small number of countries this kind of dismissal is unknown. HTH |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
redundancy for economic reasons Explanation: I'd be tempted to go with 'redundancy' rather than 'dismissal' as it implies less fault on the part of the employee. In a broader sense, you can talk about job cuts for economic reasons, laying off staff for economic reasons, depends on whether you could work those into your context ... HTH Mary experience |
| |