16:43 Dec 16, 2003 |
French to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Printing & Publishing / printing | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: William Stein Costa Rica Local time: 22:39 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +4 | you're right |
| ||
5 | break even point |
| ||
4 | breakeven / breakeven point / profit treshold |
| ||
3 | the minimum economic throughput |
| ||
3 | efficiency/probability threshold |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
seuil de rentabilité (in context) breakeven / breakeven point / profit treshold Explanation: I am totally with you. How can something be an improvement if it takes double the quantity to break even or, in other words, to reach the profit zone ? Beats me. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
the minimum economic throughput Explanation: my feeling here |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
seuil de rentabilité (in context) efficiency/probability threshold Explanation: - -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 14 mins (2003-12-16 16:57:23 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- sorry, profitability :-) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
seuil de rentabilité (in context) you're right Explanation: If the break-even point requires a bigger lot, it's not more profitable. I only see three possibilities: 1) different units (per month) versus ... (per day)?? 2) a typo 3) maybe it has a higher break-even point but has other selling points that outweigh that factor -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 hrs 46 mins (2003-12-16 22:29:53 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- It\'s definitely an \"ask the client\" situation. It\'s absolutely impossible to determine what the typo is and it would be foolish to guess. And I think you knocked the wind out of 3) pretty well, if there are no other arguments. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||