GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
14:52 Jul 31, 2000 |
German to English translations [PRO] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Manfred Mondt United States Local time: 07:15 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na | sign |
| ||
na | I agree |
| ||
na | sign |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
sign Explanation: As simple as that. See the URL, too. Cheerio, Dierk Reference: http://dict.leo.org/?search=vorzeichen&lang=en |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
I agree Explanation: Just a note to say that I agree with Dierk. If saying "sign" alone seems ambiguous, you could say "algebraic sign," but that's really not necessary. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
sign Explanation: I agree with the previous comments. Also remember: vorzeichenbehaftet - signed, vorzeichenlos - signless and occasionally even plus or minus sign will do! Manfred |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.