Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
Thanks Chris, this was what I had in fact used, but a nagging voice told me there had to be a more 'natural', less literal term! Johanna, thanks for 'for'... All the best, Jim 2 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer