-
Jobs & directories
- Learn more about
-
Member activities
- Learn more about:
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18:14 Sep 7, 2006 |
| Italian to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Bankruptcy Act | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: transparx United States Local time: 16:05 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| interamente partecipata era stata dichiarata fallita da due an fully participated, XXX, had been declared bankrupt for two years. Explanation: the company fully participated, XXX, had been declared bankrupt for two years. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
peer agreement (net): +1the XXX joint venture has been officially adjudicated as bankrupt two years ago Explanation: Contractor Application: Entity - Corporation, Patnership, Joint ... File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat The contracting entity (corporation, partnership, joint venture, ... been adjudicated as bankrupt, or is presently in the process of bankruptcy proceedings? ... www.hawaii.gov/dcca/areas/pvl/boards/contractor/application... - Similar pages -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 50 mins (2006-09-07 19:04:13 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- PDF] Internal Background Investigation Questionnaire File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML “Person” – Any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, ... Persons”) been adjudicated bankrupt or placed in receivership, filed bankruptcy, or ... www.newyorkbiz.com/Info-Opp/InternalEDCQuestionnaire.pdf - Similar pages |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
peer agreement (net): +1XXX, a wholly/fully subsidiary company, had been declared bankrupt two years before Explanation: I may be wrong, but I don't think we can use "declared bankrupt" with "for two years." "To be declared bankrupt" is an event, not a state, while "for two years" is typically [+stative]; hence, the clash. I think you could actually even use "was" instead of "had been," that is, the simple past rather than the past perfect. At any rate, given that there is no more context, It seems to me that "before" is in order here, as the reference time appears to be a past one. If the reference time were "nopw," then you would have to use "ago." -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2006-09-07 19:29:58 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- "nopw" = "now" --sorry! |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
