https://www.proz.com/kudoz/italian-to-english/law-patents/584221-phrase.html

Phrase

English translation: None = no court order as to costs i.e. litigants have to pay their own

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
Italian term or phrase:Nulla .. sulle spese
English translation:None = no court order as to costs i.e. litigants have to pay their own
Entered by: KirstyMacC (X)

13:40 Dec 1, 2003
Italian to English translations [PRO]
Law/Patents / civil litigation
Italian term or phrase: Phrase
"Nulla sulle spese nei rapporti tra l’attore e la terza chiamata" in a court judgment, following a list of court costs to be paid by the losing party..
Rod Nelson
Canada
Local time: 17:15
None/no order as to costs between the claimant(s) and the third party ( 'Part 20 Defendant)
Explanation:
If AE, still called plaintiff(s). Pluralise if co. litigant. In Eng. & Wales, now called claimant.
The third party joined in - by the Defendant - is also called Part 20 Defendant in GB.
Court does not seem minded to make an award of costs, if I understand the nulla right.
Similar order would be 'costs reserved'. Cour puts off making the award until later.


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-12-03 14:42:39 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Boils down to the the claimants and the ( = fem.) corporate third-party having to pay their own costs.
Selected response from:

KirstyMacC (X)
Local time: 01:15
Grading comment
Thank you; very helpful and very convincing.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
3None/no order as to costs between the claimant(s) and the third party ( 'Part 20 Defendant)
KirstyMacC (X)


  

Answers


12 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
None/no order as to costs between the claimant(s) and the third party ( 'Part 20 Defendant)


Explanation:
If AE, still called plaintiff(s). Pluralise if co. litigant. In Eng. & Wales, now called claimant.
The third party joined in - by the Defendant - is also called Part 20 Defendant in GB.
Court does not seem minded to make an award of costs, if I understand the nulla right.
Similar order would be 'costs reserved'. Cour puts off making the award until later.


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-12-03 14:42:39 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Boils down to the the claimants and the ( = fem.) corporate third-party having to pay their own costs.

KirstyMacC (X)
Local time: 01:15
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in pair: 435
Grading comment
Thank you; very helpful and very convincing.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also: