GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
12:30 Mar 26, 2018 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Art/Literary - Poetry & Literature | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: airmailrpl Brazil Local time: 07:35 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +6 | Fail |
| ||
4 +2 | blew it |
| ||
4 +2 | ...end of story! |
| ||
4 +1 | he slipped up! |
| ||
4 | He's out. |
|
Discussion entries: 6 | |
---|---|
Fail Explanation: e.g. Zen's question was about 'life', not about "earthly life." Giving evidence that earthly life could only exist in a narrow band is irrelevant to whether the universe is tuned for life in general. So you gave an answer to the wrong question. "Fail." On top of that, even if you had answered the right question, you'd have been supporting Zen's point that, because so little of the universe is suitable for life, it doesn't appear particularly well tuned to produce life. Double fail. https://atheistforums.org/post-632576.html -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2018-03-26 14:19:30 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Correction: Fail! |
| |