02:19 Dec 7, 2000 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
na | must not exceed 5 to 1 |
| ||
na | 5 to 1 |
| ||
na | must not exceed 5 for (each) 1 |
|
must not exceed 5 to 1 Explanation: "must" probably better than "should" Text seems clear to me on the face of it but I would defer to someone who knows the field. P Berryman |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
5 to 1 Explanation: See the refs below, where a number of elements, including VSWR, are expressed as ratios: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.wsplc.com/shopping/... http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.rfapps.com/newpage2... The P-1 computes V.S.W.R. whenever RF is present on a given channel. The formula used is: (...) An ideal situation would be one where there is some forward voltage and zero reflected volts. In this case, the V.S.W.R. would equal 1.0:1 (FORWARD+0/FORWARD-0). 1.0:1 is therefore the theoretical minimum V.S.W.R. obtainable. In practice, V.S.W.R. values as low as 1.1:1 are difficult to obtain. Note that a V.S.W.R. of 1.9:1 represents about 10% reflected power. The only problem is that the left hand part is always a number with a decimal; I don't know if that's significant. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
must not exceed 5 for (each) 1 Explanation: Ola, Acho que assim seria bom. Trata-se duma relacao quantitativa. Dr TSTagirov KSU |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.