GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17:29 Mar 7, 2014 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Peru | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Cinnamon Nolan Spain Local time: 16:40 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | Corrected in an erratum |
|
Corrected in an erratum Explanation: Also possible: Corrected in a corrigendum (if a separate page with the corrected information is included; used especially in scientific books, articles, etc.) Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. ... www.fcc.gov/cib/dro/recon517.txt Section 225 of the Communications Act requires the Commission to establish ... various typographical errors that would otherwise be corrected in an erratum. Appendix C: Annotated Bibliography - UCLA Department of Linguistics www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/ladefoge/.../appendixC.pdf by MC DIAMOND - Related articles corrected in an Erratum in a later issue; Strong intended “consonant”. ZEMLIN, W.R. (1997). Speech and Hearing Science. 4th edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 3 hrs (2014-03-07 21:11:30 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Perhaps, given the context, it'd be better to include "notice" Corrected in an erratum notice |
| |
Grading comment
| ||