inoponibilidad a la actora del contrato

23:18 Nov 25, 2008 

Wonderful explanation, thank you to all of you for helping me understand. I found this text to be particularly difficult.

22:03 Nov 25, 2008 

A mi entender la frase "a la actora" está mal colocado. La redacciòn correcta es: y en subsidio la inoponibilidad del contrato y de la dación en pago celebrados...A LA ACTORA.
Sòlo que si se cambia el orden el objeto indirecto queda muy lejos porque el objeto directo es muy largo.

20:50 Nov 25, 2008 

Now I understand, the plaintiff is arguing that the contract is not binding or enforcable against the plaintiff, but the part that continues to confuse me is "actora del contrato," why would they say that, "plaintiff's contract," when all along they are arguing that in fact the contract is not the plaintiff's but the agent's, who executed in the contract in the agent's own name and behalf. Do you understand that in sounds like a slight contradition to say the "plaintiff's contract" when all along they are denying that.

20:27 Nov 25, 2008 

perjudicar sus derechos (efectos internos del contrato entre quienes lo firmaron; efectos externos ante terceros)

20:23 Nov 25, 2008 

en el sentido de que

20:17 Nov 25, 2008 

Hola, Myriam: a mi entender está pidiendo que se declare que el contrato y la dación en pago no son oponibles a la actora en el sentido que no se pueden hacer valer contra ella.