sakrätt
English translation: indefeasible rights
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18:13 Jan 11, 2004 |
| Swedish to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: KirstyMacC (X) Local time: 21:39 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 +1 | Indefeasible rights |
| ||
| 5 | law of property |
| ||
| 4 | indefeasible right(s); right(s) in rem |
| ||
| 1 | chattels real |
|
Answers
38 mins confidence: 
| sakrätt law of property Explanation: :o) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 38 mins (2004-01-11 18:52:09 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Norstedts confirms. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
3 hrs confidence: 
indefeasible right(s); right(s) in rem Explanation: You should have left in the plural - ambiguous and confusable with property or land law. Eurodicautom for once comes up with a right answer. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
3 hrs confidence:
chattels real Explanation: While both Norstedts and Gullberg give "law of property" as the correct translation, and Sven so often makes excellent suggestions, I have to admit I have my doubts on this one. I notice that the Swedish expression is in the plural, which makes me doubt that the singular "law of property" fits this context. So, while I hesitate again to step into legal territory, I would point out that the Sv En Affärslexikon specifically mentions "begränsad sakrätt" as being "chattels real" or "real chattels". Let's hope a legal expert can answer this one. Reference: http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/manuals/tsemmanual/tsem6001/... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
13 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1Indefeasible rights Explanation: "Rights" are being referred to here, not a "law". According to Sven Martinger's Juridik Ordbok, sakrätt = dynamic third party protection (indefeasible right, right in rem) |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations