This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
This person has a SecurePRO™ card. Because this person is not a ProZ.com Plus subscriber, to view his or her SecurePRO™ card you must be a ProZ.com Business member or Plus subscriber.
Affiliations
This person is not affiliated with any business or Blue Board record at ProZ.com.
Portuguese to English: Nietzsche: a contradicter of the science of his time? General field: Social Sciences Detailed field: History
Source text - Portuguese Neste artigo, discutirei sobre a oposição de Nietzsche à ciência do seu tempo, mediante a análise do aforismo 344, intitulado Em que medida também nós ainda somos devotos, de A gaia ciência (1882). Partindo da investigação dos problemas que acometem a ciência moderna e observando maiormente o caso desse impacto sobre a ciência histórica, a minha análise evidenciará alguns dos motivos que levaram Nietzsche a fazer uma apreciação negativa da ciência moderna, assim como da ciência histórica e, dessa forma, declarar uma luta contra o seu próprio tempo, na tentativa de pôr à vista os pressupostos morais sentenciosos existentes na atividade científica da expectativa ambiente. No entanto, Nietzsche recorre a quais estratégias para pensar a superação dos pressupostos morais dogmáticos reguladores da prática científica moderna, subjacentes à metafísica, e o que isso implica e representa para a ciência e a história? Nietzsche, de fato, conseguiu ultrapassar o cientificismo dos modernos? A intenção é iluminar outro caminho para a solução do problema proposto.
Translation - English In this paper, I will discuss Nietzsche’s opposition against the science of his time, by means of an analysis of the aphorism 344, entitled To what extent even we are still pious, from The gay science (1882). From the investigation of the problems which assail modern science and, by observing more emphatically the case of such an impact on historical science, my analysis will evidence some motives which had taken Nietzsche to make a negative judgment of modern science, as well as of historical science and, by doing so, to declare war against its own time, in the tentative of showing the sententious moral intentions which existed in the scientific activity of the local expectation. However, to which strategies does Nietzsche turn to when thinking about the overcoming of the dogmatic moral intentions that regulated the modern scientific practice, which were subjacent to metaphysics, and what does it implicate and represent to science and history? Has Nietzsche, in fact, overtaken the modern scientism? The intention is to illuminate another way towards the solution of the proposed issue.
More
Less
Experience
Years of experience: 15. Registered at ProZ.com: Jul 2014.
I am a guy who loves learning about languages and cultures. Therefore, I have studied both Tourism and Portuguese/English at college, so I could work with such things. I have lived in the United States for one year and that was the most amazing time in my life. The experieces that have guided me towards where I am now only prove that I was really meant for working with languages.
Expertise