<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>ProZ.com Translation Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.proz.com/forums/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://www.proz.com/forums/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>		<description>Topic: Abbyy Finereader tuneability </description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 22:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 22:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://www.proz.com/faq</docs>
		<managingEditor>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Abbyy Finereader tuneability  | Screenshot reader</title>
			<author>Emma Goldsmith</author>
			<category>Software applications</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2061395#2061395</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Software applications&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Abbyy Finereader tuneability &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Emma Goldsmith&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Screenshot reader&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One great feature that was introduced in version 10 or 11 was the Screenshot reader. It&#039;s very useful for taking a screenshot in a non-editable format (image in Word or a PDF) and getting ABBYY to read it and then send it to the clipboard in text or table format.&lt;br /&gt;IMO, it&#039;s worth upgrading just for that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re columns and tabs - I usually select plain text output in ABBYY 11 so that I  can format it myself in Word, otherwise columns/fonts/kerning all takes ages to correct. However, as Vicotr and esperantisimo mention, if you draw tables in ABBYY itself, they will be reproduced accurately in plain text output.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HTH,&lt;br /&gt;Emma</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Abbyy Finereader tuneability  | Finding the settings</title>
			<author>Victor Dewsbery</author>
			<category>Software applications</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2061385#2061385</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Software applications&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Abbyy Finereader tuneability &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Victor Dewsbery&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Finding the settings&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hi, I recently moved up from FR8 to FR11. My subjective impression is that the text recognition has improved. I have used the automatic functions to do a quick scan of a couple of jobs for a quotation (before I know whether it is worthwhile to do a more careful job), and in the one case which I did in both FR8 and FR11, far more text was recognised in FR11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When you open FR11, the first thing you see is a big box with a selection of automatic functions. But you can, in fact, close this box and use the menu items, which certainly offer more flexibility than the fully automatic functions. I am still getting used to FR11 and there are some options that I haven&#039;t yet found. But you can certainly define a block manually as a table and ask FR11 to analyse the table layout. I seem to remember it taking me one or two extra mouse clicks to do so, but it is possible. I haven&#039;t yet explored to see if FR11 adds options which I was missing in FR8 (e.g. splitting a table column or table cell into two).</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Abbyy Finereader tuneability  | Stick to 8</title>
			<author>esperantisto</author>
			<category>Software applications</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2061376#2061376</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Software applications&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Abbyy Finereader tuneability &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; esperantisto&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Stick to 8&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In my experience, FR 9 and later demonstrates worse (albeit slightly) text recognition as compared to FR 8, so I still stick to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[quote]not create multi-column text but tabulator-separated lines[/quote]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don’t quite understand what you need, but why not mark up the segments for recognition as text tables?</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Abbyy Finereader tuneability </title>
			<author>Heinrich Pesch</author>
			<category>Software applications</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2061374#2061374</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Software applications&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Abbyy Finereader tuneability &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Heinrich Pesch&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would like to hear about experiences with Finereader newer versions. I have version 8, but the output is not always optimal. Is it possible in version 11+ to set the output so that the software does not create multi-column text but tabulator-separated lines? These columns need much editing when the final text is of different length after translation.&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for more info.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(I know I can try the software but my trial period is over).</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>