<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>ProZ.com Translation Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.proz.com/forums/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://www.proz.com/forums/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>		<description>Topic: Adaptation vs Localization</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 18:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 18:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://www.proz.com/faq</docs>
		<managingEditor>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Adaptation vs Localization</title>
			<author>Carole V.</author>
			<category>Localization</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2730761#2730761</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Localization&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Adaptation vs Localization&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Carole V.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dear colleagues,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in your experience, do you consider an adaptation request is different from a localization one? To what extent, do you use a different methodology and/or apply a different rate?&lt;br /&gt;To me this seems pretty much the same, i.e. adapting a text for a specific market (country or region or target group). In my case I work on French variants (Luxembourg, Switzerland) and mostly rely on comparing specifics from some similar source texts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many thanks for your opinion and best practices!&lt;br /&gt;Carole</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>