<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>ProZ.com Translation Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.proz.com/forums/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://www.proz.com/forums/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>		<description>Topic: Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 20:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://www.proz.com/faq</docs>
		<managingEditor>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>support@proz.com (ProZ.com Support)</webMaster>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | For direct clients only</title>
			<author>Nikolay Novitskiy</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2934005#2934005</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2021 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Nikolay Novitskiy&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; For direct clients only&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s hard to pull oneself out of a mire by your own hair, and that&#039;s why you need a proofreader to check your text.  I have three colleagues of mine whom I trust (they won&#039;t try to steal my client from me and they are great translators).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[Edited at 2021-11-28 06:53 GMT]</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Other</title>
			<author>Mario Freitas</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932364#2932364</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Mario Freitas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Other&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Only when requested and paid separately by the client.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Never</title>
			<author>The Shredder</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932234#2932234</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; The Shredder&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Never&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What on Earth for? My work is perfect. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I check it myself and correct any mistakes I find. Why would I need to get anyone else involved?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is like asking a bus driver whether they get someone to turn the steering wheel for them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | With a little help of a friend</title>
			<author>Thayenga</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932223#2932223</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Thayenga&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; With a little help of a friend&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If in doubt, then one of my friends, also a professional translator/editor check my translation. The rate? It works both ways, so no charge. ;)</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | missing alternative answer(s)</title>
			<author>Antonio Tomás Lessa do Amaral</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932205#2932205</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Antonio Tomás Lessa do Amaral&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; missing alternative answer(s)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;missing alternative answer(s): &lt;br /&gt;a) always, &lt;br /&gt;b) it is a part of my services.&lt;br /&gt;it is not so much a question of costs, it pays in the long run AND mostly I compensate colleagues by checking their own work </description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Electronic aids</title>
			<author>Muriel Vasconcellos (X)</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932202#2932202</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Muriel Vasconcellos (X)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Electronic aids&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;[quote]Ricardo Sandy Aries wrote:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I frequently use Grammarly + Microsoft Office built-in proofing tools for assisted-proofreading needs. These tools are sufficient for any volume of text (as long as your computer has a large RAM and a fast CPU). [/quote]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m not much of a fan of Grammarly, but I use PerfectIt and the Microsoft tools. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I try to produce a finished translation as I go along, marking the sticky parts for further attention. Once the sticky parts are resolved, the document is quite clean before I start proofreading it. Then I always proofread twice: once for the meaning and finally for errors.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Other</title>
			<author>Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932199#2932199</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Maria Teresa Borges de Almeida&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Other&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Almost all my work is proofread by another pair of eyes (the only exceptions are very short texts = a few pages), my quote always includes revision by a second linguist, unless the client has expressly indicated otherwise (some translation agencies have their own proofreader). I have an arrangement with a trusted colleague (we worked in-house together for 20 years) where we proofread each other&#039;s work. When she is not available I use the services of two Proz members with whom I have built a good working relationship over the years and they have done the same. I for one have learned a lot with their revisions, hope the same has happened with them. Quality-wise, it&#039;s the BEST decision I&#039;ve ever made...</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Software-Assisted Proofreading Only</title>
			<author>Ricardo Aries</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932198#2932198</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Ricardo Aries&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Software-Assisted Proofreading Only&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I frequently use Grammarly + Microsoft Office built-in proofing tools for assisted-proofreading needs. These tools are sufficient for any volume of text (as long as your computer has a large RAM and a fast CPU).</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | Other</title>
			<author>neilmac</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932193#2932193</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; neilmac&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; Other&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sometimes I get a trusted colleague to proofread the odd translation. But most of the time I do my own.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader? | For direct clients</title>
			<author>Edith van der Have</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932189#2932189</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; Edith van der Have&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Post title:&lt;/b&gt; For direct clients&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All my projects for direct clients are proofread by a fellow-translator. I don&#039;t have just one colleague with whom I collaborate; the proofreader depends on the subject matter. Of course, I&#039;ve incorporated the extra costs for the four-eyes principle in my rate.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?</title>
			<author>ProZ.com Staff</author>
			<category>Poll Discussion</category>
			<link>http://www.proz.com/post/2932186#2932186</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;b&gt;Forum:&lt;/b&gt; Poll Discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Topic:&lt;/b&gt; Poll: Do you make use of your own proofreader?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Poster:&lt;/b&gt; ProZ.com Staff&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question &quot;Do you make use of your own proofreader?&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; View the poll results &amp;raquo;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>