u.a.

16:31 Nov 4, 2008 

IMO this should be a pro-entry because:

u.a. can mean a lot of things (see links below) - all depending on context - it does mean "unter anderem" most of the time - and that is the long version suggested most of the time. If "unter anderem" does not make sense, it might not be so easily comprehensible.
Also, at least three different and possibly correct variations have been offered here: unten aufgeführt, angeführt oder angegeben. So there is room for stylistically differing thought/suggestions.
http://abkuerzungen.woxikon.de/abkuerzung/u.a..php
http://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/u.a.
Below are the proz.com guidelines.

But apart from those guidelines, my argument is this: for a native speaker of German, it is fairly easy to understand u.a. in the above context (he/she has probably come across it and the context helps). For a native English speaker who is also a translator from German into English, it might not be so easily clear what to make of this u.a. here. It might be easy to see that it cannot mean "unter anderem/n" but what it really stands for can only be determined if you have come across this before or were able to easily find it confirmed in a dictionary. Also, if this question is non-pro, there won't be any comments from proz who decided to screen out non-pro questions. I think with this it is not totally easy and sheds an important other meaning on u.a.
Just my thoughts.

http://www.proz.com/translation-articles/articles/95/
Non-PRO questions are those that are asked by people who are not professional translators and that can be answered by any bilingual person without the aid of a dictionary.