Romanian term (edited): poziþie procesualã

Cred că despre asta e vorba:

Plaintiff has moved to strike portions of defendant's reply brief that make new arguments in alleged violation of Supreme Court Rule 341(g) (155 Ill. 2d R. ...
www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/ 1998/1stDistrict/October/HTML/1970125.htm

From the defendant's Reply Brief, "Defendants in this case have never disputed that the ITS infrastructure and the conventional highway portions of the ...
www.celdf.org/glsp/glsp9b.asp

In order to avoid additional delay in this proceeding, we deem this document respondent's reply brief and accept it for filing in the record. ...
www.cftc.gov/ogc/oporders00/ogczuccarelli030700.htm - 9k - 27 Jun 2005

On April 28, 2003, I received a copy of Respondent's reply brief to the ARB in ... Respondent's Reply brief contained a factual misrepresentation at pages 9 ...
www.oalj.dol.gov/ printdoc.htm?URL=%2Fpublic%2Fwblower%2Fdecsn%2F03air03d.htm - 16k


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 days (2005-07-02 11:05:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Re. Asker’s note:

“Statement of defence” (întâmpinarea) este un document specific, depus iniţial ca răspuns la capetele de acuzare:
Statement of Defense: In response to the complaint the defendant is allowed to respond with a statement of defense, also called an \"answer\" or \"plea.\" The purpose of the statement of defense is to bring forward whatever defense the defendant may have and may wish to interpose in order to bar the plaintiff\'s claim, to raise issues against the plaintiff, and to develop all issues between the
parties. http://www.dhlaw.de/eng/elt/manuscript.pdf

The Purpose of the Statement of Defense is to outline for the Court, and the Plaintiff, why the Defendant should not be held responsible for the wrongs claimed in the Statement of Claim. Again, this is not the stage where you should be expecting to overpower or defeat the Plaintiff\'s claim. The Statement of Defense outlines the legal principles and counter allegations that support your refusal to accept responsibility for the Plaintiff\'s claims against you. http://www.adr-solutions.ca/litigation2.html

Deoarece titlul documentului tău n-a fost “întâmpinare”, când ţi-am propus varianta “defendant’s reply brief” m-am ghidat după conţinutul documentului, nu după titlu (pentru că n-am înţeles de ce se cheamă “poziţie procesuală”). Deci am propus un termen general care poate fi aplicat documentului descris de tine. “Defendant’s reply brief” se utilizează pentru documente care pot fi depuse oricând pe parcursul procesului, ca răspuns la acuzaţii, moţiuni etc. depuse de consilierul juridic al reclamantului; după cum a arătat Mihaela, se utilizează şi la apel.

Problema “poziţiei procesuale” ca titlu în acest context rămâne, din păcate, nerezolvată – nu cunosc suficient de bine detaliile dreptului penal român pentru a înţelege de ce s-a folosit acest titlu, şi nu “întâmpinare”. Sunt înclinată să cred că s-a folosit în sens de „întâmpinare”, dar nu pot fi sigură. :)