Very low level of confidence because you give no context whatsoever.

"Noteworthy, easy-to-read history of translation of Bible into English, beginning with Ancient Versions which have an affect on the English translations to come. Here he explores such efforts as the Coptic, Georgian, Sogdian and Nubian Versions. "
( From: http://tinyurl.com/yqp9ut )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 mins (2007-03-17 17:12:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Acdtually, I think better would be:

Coptic Version



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2007-03-17 17:16:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

"Coptic Versions: New Testaments in Coptic (Bohairic and Sahidic) from sahidica.org. (2007-01-17)"
( From: http://tinyurl.com/22rcev )

"The papyrus fragments containing `Sayings of Jesus' in Greek, mentioned on p. 86, are now known to have belonged to a much larger compilation, which has lately come to light intact in a Coptic translation. This Coptic translation is the `Gospel of Thomas', included in the Nag Hammadi papyri . . . "
( From: http://tinyurl.com/2e7yhf )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2007-03-17 17:17:52 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://tinyurl.com/yta673
http://tinyurl.com/2bpqk4
(more references)