Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
L\'état délivré sur cette formalité était négatif
English translation:
The post-completion search issued was clear with regards to the seller
Added to glossary by
Eoghan McMonagle
Dec 10, 2014 20:59
9 yrs ago
8 viewers *
French term
L'état délivré sur cette formalité était négatif
French to English
Law/Patents
Real Estate
"L'état délivré sur cette formalité était négatif du chef du vendeur."
The context is a deed of conveyance under the ownership title section. The line above was "This acquisition took place by means of the payment, in full and in cash, of the principle price one hundred and thirty-five thousand Euros (€135,000), at the signing of the deed.
A certified copy of this deed was published in the Land Registry of xxx , on xxx , in Volume xxx, number xxx.
I have no idea what this is talking about. I assume "chef du vendeur" just means "vendor". But the rest...? Can anyone have a go at the translation?
The context is a deed of conveyance under the ownership title section. The line above was "This acquisition took place by means of the payment, in full and in cash, of the principle price one hundred and thirty-five thousand Euros (€135,000), at the signing of the deed.
A certified copy of this deed was published in the Land Registry of xxx , on xxx , in Volume xxx, number xxx.
I have no idea what this is talking about. I assume "chef du vendeur" just means "vendor". But the rest...? Can anyone have a go at the translation?
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +2 | (BrE) The formal pre-completion search issued was a clear one (as regards the seller) | Adrian MM. (X) |
Proposed translations
+2
11 hrs
French term (edited):
L'état délivré sur cette formalité était négatif (du chef du vendeur)
Selected
(BrE) The formal pre-completion search issued was a clear one (as regards the seller)
See Tony M's discussion entry in the web ref. and above as he clearly has a better idea of conveyancing practice than most commentators.
Bringing Latin America into the equation may not be very helpful.
du chef de > in the capacity of
vendeur > seller and buyer have been used in UK conveyancing since the E&W Law Society's 1990 Standard Conds. of Sale of Land.
Vendor & Purchaser went out as user-unfriendly but are still used.
BTW, it's not principle but principal sum.
Origine de propriété > root of title: remember the 3-part EN test for a good root in unregd. conveyancing. I assume everyone knows the difference between regd. and unregd. conveyancing.
1. at least 15 years old 2. no break in the chain of ownership and 3. contains nothing to cast doubt on the title.
Jouissance divise > split beneficial use if there is supposed to be an accent on the last e.
Evaluation > valuation of the property
Prise en charge d'emprunt > adoption so tak-over of (mortgage) of loan
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 hrs (2014-12-11 08:07:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
adoption so tak-over of (mortgage) of loan > so take-over of the (mortgage) loan
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2014-12-11 09:24:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
OK. Pre-registration formaility.
Bringing Latin America into the equation may not be very helpful.
du chef de > in the capacity of
vendeur > seller and buyer have been used in UK conveyancing since the E&W Law Society's 1990 Standard Conds. of Sale of Land.
Vendor & Purchaser went out as user-unfriendly but are still used.
BTW, it's not principle but principal sum.
Origine de propriété > root of title: remember the 3-part EN test for a good root in unregd. conveyancing. I assume everyone knows the difference between regd. and unregd. conveyancing.
1. at least 15 years old 2. no break in the chain of ownership and 3. contains nothing to cast doubt on the title.
Jouissance divise > split beneficial use if there is supposed to be an accent on the last e.
Evaluation > valuation of the property
Prise en charge d'emprunt > adoption so tak-over of (mortgage) of loan
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 hrs (2014-12-11 08:07:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
adoption so tak-over of (mortgage) of loan > so take-over of the (mortgage) loan
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2014-12-11 09:24:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
OK. Pre-registration formaility.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Tony M
: You're a gent!
1 hr
|
Thanks. I have credited you with the searches idea.
|
|
agree |
B D Finch
: Superbly comprehensive. Only slight niggle: "du chef de > in the capacity of" in your explanation, but agree with "as regards" in your header even if I have a personal pref. for "with regard to".
1 hr
|
OK and thanks.
|
|
neutral |
Tim Webb
: It is not a pre-completion search but a post-completion search. http://www.notaires-franchecomte.fr/spip.php?article136
2 hrs
|
OK - post-completion and pre-reg. then.
|
|
neutral |
Jennifer Levey
: Even with Asker's additional context (see disc. box) your answer is factually incorrect (as pointed out by Tim06).
3 hrs
|
I've already changed my answer from pre-completion to pre-registration and you will be familiar with the searches procedure from your UK conveyancing practice or US 'deeding' of land and escrow reg. experience.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "I'm glad to see this created an interesting discussion and debate. Thank you very much to everyone for your help. I really appreciate it."
Discussion
The order of presentation still makes no sense - it says the property has been sold and paid for in full before checking whether the seller is free to sell it, or determining whether any existing mortgage is transferrable to the buyer.
The result of notifying them of the sale results in the return of a 'statement' or 'report' (which is what this 'état' is), which confirms that the Seller doesn't / didn't have a mortgage outstanding on the property, or the presence of any other liens of any kind.
I am pretty sure the 'formality' in question is what is known here in Chile as a "Certificado de Hipotecas, Gravámenes y Prohibiciones (GP)" - i.e. a certificate from the Real Estate Registrar (in Chile: Conservador de Bienes Raíces) saying that the property that is being sold is not subject to any restrictions 'du chef du vendeur' - i.e. the vendor does not have a mortgage on the property or other impediments to the sale of the property (seizure of the property by the courts, expropriation pending, etc.).
See, for example:
Certificado de Hipotecas, Gravámenes y Prohibiciones (GP ...
https://www.conservador.cl/portal/gpTranslate this page
Certificado de Hipotecas, Gravámenes y Prohibiciones (GP). i. Es un certificado que incluye los gravámenes que afectan a un bien raíz como hipotecas, ...
I see nothing in "The line above", which you have now quoted, that could possibly correspond to "cette formalité" ("this formality"). What do you think "cette formalité" refers back to?
"The original issued for this formality was negative for the vendor."
I don't like it at all.
I have seen in another Proz forum that "l'état" can mean an original document and "chef de" can mean "in favour of" or "for" in more simple terms. But as I say, I am really not loving my attempt.
So if anyone would like to have a go at improving it (including my translation of the text coming before it, which I am no longer "certain is accurate" after reading your comments), I would really appreciate it. Thanks in advance for your help. :D
Une copie authentique de cet act a été publiée au service de la publicité foncière de xxxx le xxxxx, volume xxxx, numéro xxx."
I will post the original text in a separate post as I don't have enough characters here. Just give me a sec. :)
Jane’s quote in French, headed “2.1. CERTIFICAT DE DÉPÔT NÉGATIF”, is no doubt very relevant to your question. And, as you’re a “registered lawyer” it should be amply sufficient to point you in the right direction.
The source text is in a pdf of which I can't copy and paste, but I have provided the translation, which I am certain is accurate. Is there any reason you need the source text?
And I also found this:</p></p>
2.1. CERTIFICAT DE DÉPÔT NÉGATIF
La délivrance par le conservateur des hypothèques d'un certificat de dépôt négatif ou comportant la seule
référence à la formalité de l'acte de vente qui accompagne la demande de renseignements signifie
qu'aucune formalité n'est intervenue ou n'est en attente de publication au fichier immobilier
(pour la période de mise à jour du fichier jusqu'au terme de la période de certification indiquée dans la
demande de renseignements).