GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23:33 Dec 18, 2010 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Contract(s) / Brasil | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Ivan Rocha, CT Canada | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Duty of the parties to present evidence |
| ||
3 | judicial discretion to admit evidence |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
judicial discretion to admit evidence Explanation: The case law on the princípio dispositivo in Brazil goes back to Article 130 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which indicates that the decision to determine whether evidence is relevant is the judge's, either sua sponte or at a party's motion. The article does not say that the judge may order gathering of evidence and the case law says that he/she need not order it gathered. Reference: http://www.jusbrasil.com.br/topicos/924245/principio-disposi... Reference: http://www.clubjus.com.br/?artigos&ver=3.9073 |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Duty of the parties to present evidence Explanation: Segundo o princípio dispositivo, cabe às partes (e não ao juiz) especificar quais provas suportam a demanda (ou a defesa). Em outras palavras: o juiz (em regra) não pode agir "ex officio" quanto às provas, devendo, comumente, aguardas a iniciativa do autor e do réu nesse sentido. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.