Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
reasonably practicable
Latvian translation:
praktiski iespeejami(reaali)
Added to glossary by
ilbe
Aug 10, 2004 12:55
20 yrs ago
English term
reasonably practicable
Non-PRO
English to Latvian
Other
Business/Commerce (general)
Company X undertates to ensure as far as is reasonably practicable that:
Proposed translations
(Latvian)
| 3 | cik vien tas ir pilniigi praktiski iespeejami(reaali), ka... |
ilbe
|
| 5 +1 | saprāta robeās |
Uldis Liepkalns
|
| 5 | sapr'at'igi realiz'ejams |
LIGA LINSSEN
|
Proposed translations
3 days 7 hrs
Selected
cik vien tas ir pilniigi praktiski iespeejami(reaali), ka...
abiem vaardiem ir loti daudz noziimju un vienkaarshi jaameklee labaakaa kombinaacija
2 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+1
3 mins
Uldis Liepkalns
Latvia
Latvia
Specializes in field
Latvia
Mark it as done
Works in: English to Latvian, English to Lithuanian, English to Estonian, and 11 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
42
1 day 20 hrs
LIGA LINSSEN
Native in Latvian
Specializes in field
with good translator`s expierence
Native in: Latvian 
Works in: English to Latvian, Latvian, Lithuanian to Latvian, and 6 more.
sapr'at'igi realiz'ejams
v'el ar'i der:
cik vien tas ir s'apr'at'igi piepild'ams(sasniedzams)
Reasonably Practicable:
Defined by Judge Asquith in Edwards vs The National Coal Board:
'Reasonably Practicable' is a narrower term than 'Physically Possible', and seems to me to imply that computation must be made by the owner in which the quantum of risk is placed on one scale and the sacrifice involved in the measures necessary for averting the risk (whether in time, money or trouble) is placed in the other, and that if it be shown that there is a gross disproportion between them - the risk being insignificant in relation to the sacrifice - the defendants discharge the onus on them.
cik vien tas ir s'apr'at'igi piepild'ams(sasniedzams)
Reasonably Practicable:
Defined by Judge Asquith in Edwards vs The National Coal Board:
'Reasonably Practicable' is a narrower term than 'Physically Possible', and seems to me to imply that computation must be made by the owner in which the quantum of risk is placed on one scale and the sacrifice involved in the measures necessary for averting the risk (whether in time, money or trouble) is placed in the other, and that if it be shown that there is a gross disproportion between them - the risk being insignificant in relation to the sacrifice - the defendants discharge the onus on them.
Something went wrong...