I don't speak Finnish but it seems to be electromagnetic compatibility and compliance with the provision of the directive

"Whereas, for apparatus covered by Directive 86/361/EEC, in order to obtain efficient protection as regards electromagnetic compatibility, compliance with the provisions of this Directive should nevertheless be certified by marks or certificates of conformity issued by bodies notified by the Member States; whereas, to facilitate the mutual recognition of marks and certificates issued by these bodies, the criteria to be taken into consideration for appointing them should be harmonized." (Whereas, for apparatus covered by Directive 86/361/EEC, in order to obtain efficient protection as regards electromagnetic compatibility, compliance with the provisions of this Directive should nevertheless be certified by marks or certificates of conformity issued by bodies notified by the Member States; whereas, to facilitate the mutual recognition of marks and certificates issued by these bodies, the criteria to be taken into consideration for appointing them should be harmonized)

See in : http://www.tukes.fi/sahkoturvallisuus/saadokset/89-336-ety.h...

FI text: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/fi/lif/dat/1999/fi_399L0005.htm... and the same in English: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1999/en_399L0005.htm...

http://www.met.fi/standard/uutuudet/harm_emc.html
http://www.sfs.fi/standard/newappr.html