This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Freelance translator and/or interpreter, Verified site user
Data security
This person has a SecurePRO™ card. Because this person is not a ProZ.com Plus subscriber, to view his or her SecurePRO™ card you must be a ProZ.com Business member or Plus subscriber.
Affiliations
This person is not affiliated with any business or Blue Board record at ProZ.com.
Source text - Spanish Cómo montar un estudio de diseño y no morir en el intento. XXX. Diseñador, Fundador de XXX
Introducción
A veces avanzar en situaciones difíciles requiere de bastante determinación y algo de suerte. Creo que podemos encontrar un poco de ambas cosas en la creación de XXX, un estudio de diseño lanzado en plena crisis.
En este artículo se recogen algunas opiniones, fruto de la experiencia en primera persona, que espero puedan servir de ayuda o inspiración.
Nuestras motivaciones
Cuando empezamos a pensar en montar el estudio llevábamos ya mucho tiempo en el sector, y nos dimos cuenta de que teníamos ideas propias a la hora de definir cómo nos gustaría trabajar.
Buscábamos principalmente estar orgullosos de nuestro trabajo, poder organizarnos de una forma más libre y algo más de rentabilidad.
Y queríamos hacerlo sobre una base de honestidad: honestidad hacia nuestro trabajo, hacia nuestros clientes y hacia nuestro equipo. Queríamos alejarnos del "todo vale" de los proyectos con prisas, del "sí, señor" de las agencias y del "podemos hacerlo todo" de las grandes consultoras.
Creamos un producto, no una empresa
Para nosotros fue de gran ayuda pensar en la empresa como un producto, con unas características claras y definidas. Si ese producto tenía sitio en el mercado estaríamos encantados; pero si no lo tenía, simplemente lo retiraríamos.
Es decir, la empresa en sí misma no tenía valor, lo que era importante era cómo hacía las cosas. De esta manera poníamos el foco en lo realmente importante: trabajar a nuestra manera, teniendo siempre claras las razones por las que pusimos todo en marcha.
Primeros pasos
Poner en marcha un proyecto así no fue sencillo. Para optar a proyectos relevantes necesitábamos un equipo muy senior, que no dejara duda alguna de su solvencia delante de grandes clientes.
Pero era prácticamente imposible fichar directamente ese tipo de perfiles, todos ya con buenos trabajos y remuneraciones. Así que tratamos de resolver el problema de la siguiente manera:
• Definimos las grandes áreas de responsabilidad en la empresa, buscamos a una persona idónea para ellas y le ofrecimos ser socio. Poca gente bien posicionada se subiría al barco por un sueldo incierto, pero la idea de crear algo propio les resultaba mucho más atractiva.
• No obstante, los porcentajes en la participación no fueron simétricos sino que se definieron en función de la aportación de valor de cada uno, entendida como talento, criterio, relevancia y proyección comercial.
• Todos trabajábamos internamente como freelancers, pudiendo compaginarlo con proyectos fuera del estudio.
• Cada uno cobraba según las horas trabajadas, evitando las sensaciones de injusticia y agravios comparativos.
Así formamos un equipo con amplia experiencia e implicado a futuro, pero con la libertad y la flexibilidad necesarias para sobrellevar el lanzamiento hasta que XXX consiguiera masa crítica de proyectos.
Una organización flexible
El sistema de organización en XXX es muy flexible. El equipo tiene libertad para organizarse (horario, situación, etc.) siempre que se garantice la calidad del trabajo, las fechas de entrega y una comunicación fluida con el resto del equipo y con el cliente.
Este sistema requiere personas muy responsables y una empresa que les otorgue la confianza necesaria para serlo.
"La gente tiende a comportarse como tú esperas que lo hagan". La idea central del conocido efecto Pigmalion – ampliamente estudiado en educación – es que las expectativas que se tienen de una persona influyen en su comportamiento.
Según nuestra experiencia, cuando se siente desconfianza hacia las personas, cuando se les trata de irresponsables a los que hay que controlar, ellos tienden a comportarse exactamente de esa manera. En cambio, si se les da confianza, ésta es devuelta de manera multiplicada.
Hay quien dice que tenemos un modelo de "no gestión". No estoy de acuerdo. Tenemos un modelo de gestión autónoma, basado en la responsabilidad personal, que nos permite reducir el tiempo dedicado al control del equipo y maximiza su eficiencia y autonomía.
De pérdidas e inversiones
El ser capaz de llevar a la realidad los principios de calidad, libertad y justicia en las relaciones con el equipo conlleva un cierto sobredimensionamiento en personal respecto a lo que es habitual en el sector.
Podría pensarse que es un dinero que XXX pierde, pero nosotros preferimos verlo como un dinero que XXX invierte.
Y lo invierte en mantener un equipo en buenas condiciones mentales, sin una carga de trabajo al límite. Lo que favorece que pueda centrarse más y mejor en los proyectos, y redunda en la calidad final del producto, que es la más importante de nuestras señas de identidad.
Los peligros
Si tuviera que señalar el mayor peligro que ha amenazado nuestras ideas, éste ha sido la avaricia.
Hay que tener mucho cuidado en no aceptar más proyectos de los que se pueden llevar bien, lo que significa tener que decir que no a proyectos muy interesantes.
Hay que intentar saber qué proyectos pueden ser lucrativos, pero no encajan con tu empresa.
Y hay que resistir las tentaciones al revisar los costes salariales y pensar que la gente podría trabajar mucho más por mucho menos…
A modo de epílogo
Wesley, el protagonista de La princesa prometida, cae prisionero del temido Pirata Roberts, quien le perdona la vida pero sólo por un día. Wesley trabaja muy duro y por la noche Roberts le dice "Buenas noches, buen trabajo, duerme bien. Lo más probable es que te mate mañana". Y esa misma frase se la repite todas las noches durante muchos años, hasta que finalmente le hace capitán. Bajar la guardia significa perder tensión y foco.
Translation - English How to set up a design studio and not perish in the process. XXX. Designer, Founder of XXX.
Introduction
Sometimes making progress in difficult situations requires considerable determination and a little luck as well. I think we can find a little bit of both in the creation of XXX, a design studio launched in the middle of a crisis.
This article includes several views, the result of first-hand experience, which I hope can be of help or inspiration.
Our motivations
When we started thinking about setting up the studio we had already been in the business a long time and we realized we had our own ideas when it came to defining how we wanted to work.
Mainly we wanted to be proud of our work, to be able to organize ourselves more freely and to make a little more profit.
And we wanted to do so with a basis of honesty: honesty towards our work, towards our customers and towards our team. We wanted to move away from the "anything goes" of rushed projects, the "yes, sir" of the agencies and the "we can do everything" of the big consultants.
We created a product, not a company
For us it was a big help to think of the company as a product, with some clear and distinct characteristics. If that product had a place in the market we would be delighted; but if not, we would simply withdraw it.
In other words, the company itself had no value; what was important was how it did things. In this way we put the focus on what really matters: working our way, always being clear about the reasons why we started this endeavor.
First Steps
Launching such a project was not easy. To compete for important projects we needed a very senior team, one that would leave no doubt as to its competency when dealing with major clients.
But it was practically impossible to directly sign up that kind of individual because they all already had good jobs and salaries. So we tried to solve the problem as follows:
• We defined the major areas of responsibility in the company; we looked for a suitable person for each and offered him/her a partnership. Few well positioned people would come on board for uncertain wages, but they found the idea of creating something of their own much more attractive.
• However, participation percentages were not symmetrical but rather were defined based on each individual's contribution, understood as talent, judgment, relevance and commercial potential.
• We all worked as freelancers internally, with the option of combining that work with projects outside the studio.
• Each of us charged based on hours worked, thus avoiding sensations of injustice and comparative grievances.
This way we formed a team with extensive experience and a commitment to the future, but with the freedom and flexibility to cope with the launch until XXX became successful.
A flexible organization
The organization system at XXX is very flexible. The team has the freedom to organize themselves (time, location, etc.) provided that work quality, deadlines and good communication with the rest of the team and the client are guaranteed.
This system requires very responsible people and a company that gives them the confidence needed to be responsible.
"People tend to behave as you expect them to". The thrust of the Pygmalion effect - extensively studied in education - is that the expectations we have of a person influence his or her behavior.
It has been our experience that, when you feel distrust towards people, when you treat those you need to control as being irresponsible,that is exactly how they tend to behave. On the other hand, if you trust them, that trust is returned multiplied.
Some say we have a model of "no management". I disagree. We have a model of self-management, based on personal responsibility, which allows us to reduce the time spent on control of the team and maximizes their efficiency and autonomy.
About losses and investments
Being able to bring to reality the principles of quality, freedom and justice in relationships with the team implies a certain oversizing of personnel with respect to what is common in the industry.
One might think that it is money that XXX is losing, but we prefer to see it as money that XXX is investing.
And we are investing it in maintaining a team with a good mental attitude, without a workload to the limit. This leads to more and better focus on projects, and influences the final quality of the product, which is the most important part of our identity.
The Dangers
If I had to pinpoint the greatest danger that has threatened our ideas, it is greed.
You have to be very careful not to take on more projects than you can handle, which means having to say no to some very interesting projects.
You must try to determine which projects may be lucrative, but do not fit with your company.
And you must resist the temptation to revise wage costs and to think that people could work much more for much less ...
As an epilogue
Wesley, the protagonist of The Princess Bride, is taken prisoner of the Dread Pirate Roberts, who spares his life but only for a day. Wesley works very hard and in the evening Roberts says "Good night, good job, sleep well. I most likely will kill you tomorrow." And Roberts repeats that same sentence to Wesley every night for many years, until finally he makes him a captain. Dropping your guard means losing attention and focus.
I have a PhD in Spanish Language and Literature and have lived and studied in Spain and Mexico. As a professor I have taught Hispanic literature classes as well as upper division language, grammar and composition/conversation courses for Spanish majors. I developed and implemented a program of Spanish language study specifically designed for medical professionals which I taught at hospitals in Arizona and Idaho.
I have been translating for over 35 years. My earliest accomplishments were a consequence of my association with the university community, usually via referrals, and included projects of varying genre, complexity and magnitude. Since 2009, I have been working for ServiceScape.com, an online marketplace that provides multilingual editing, translation, and graphic design services. I currently have an Elite rating as a translator in this company and have completed translation projects that include but are not limited to:
• College theses and scholarly reviews
• Literary critiques
• Medical reports
• Insurance claims
• Legal documents and certificates
• Employee benefit manuals
• Travel and leisure advertising materials.
I joined Proz.com in 2012 to take advantage of their network of services and resources while doing private freelance translation and working for that other on-line translation company. In 2014, I decided to also pursue translation assignments posted on the Proz.com Web site and was accepted into the ProZ.Com Certified PRO Network of translators in April, 2015. Shortly thereafter I was accepted into Translators without borders.
This user has earned KudoZ points by helping other translators with PRO-level terms. Click point total(s) to see term translations provided.