07:17 May 2, 2008 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Ken Cox Local time: 12:21 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +2 | comment |
| ||
1 | as she voluntarily gave up her right to respond at a certain time |
|
Discussion entries: 4 | |
---|---|
as she voluntarily gave up her right to respond at a certain time Explanation: is one possible interpretation |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
comment Explanation: I agree with Tony's suggestion that this is a simple error. The 'time to answer' in a divorce proceeding is the time the defendent is formally granted (by law) to respond to the petition for divorce filed by the plaintiff. If the defendent (being either realistic or a gentleman) waives the time to answer (i.e. does not insist on using it), the proceeding can continue directly without first having to wait for this time to expire. It seems rather unlikely that 'her' refers to the plaintiff here -- first because this is not how legal language is written, and second because the defendent is not entitled to waive a right of the plaintiff. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question. You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. KudoZ™ translation helpThe KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also: Search millions of term translations Your current localization setting
English
Select a language Close search
|