Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

refranchise (to an strategic partner)

Spanish translation:

traspasar una franquicia (a un socio estratégico)

Added to glossary by nimrodtran
Jan 30, 2003 18:24
22 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term

refranchise

English to Spanish Law/Patents
A's resources in Spain were devoted to developing the B restaurant concept, which was refranchised to a strategic partner.

Proposed translations

6 hrs
Selected

cuya franquicia se traspasó

muy guessing, eh?

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-01-31 01:17:46 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

www.lanuevaespana.es/archivo/2002/ MAR/26/periodico/PG060DEP263.htm

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-01-31 01:48:27 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I\'ve thought \"refranquiciar\". but don\'t like it.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Gracias."
46 mins

que había cedido los derechos de / su condición de franquicia

A pretty complete explanation in English. Hope it helps.


Franchise Zone: Why do companies refranchise? What are their goals?

Kenneth R. Costello: Typically, [with the companies] you’ve heard about recently, the goal is an effort to raise capital and pay off debt by franchising units and selling off company-owned operations. But there’s also just a philosophical difference, where different management groups perceive they should be more company-owned or more franchised. So it may just be a re-emphasis on franchising where a prior administration was more inclined to develop through company-owned [units].

Joe Mathews: When companies refranchise, often it has to do with just getting better execution on the store level. They feel there’s some sort of loss of control or disconnect on how they’re operating particular units, and sometimes it’s a move back to their core competency, which is franchising. If they can’t control it from a strong central authority, they refranchise it and give up control to get the better execution. Generally when they refranchise, it’s a turnaround strategy. Usually units are going down financially and it’s an attempt to correct that.

How does refranchising benefit franchisors?

Costello: One of the benefits is that it’s a way to use the entrepreneurial skills of franchisees who have financially invested in a unit vs. putting a store manager in a unit. There’s a tendency for franchisees to work harder. Their capital is at risk, so they’re more attentive to the operations and the profitability of the units. Certainly company-owned units that are marginally profitable can very often be run more profitably by franchisees. By refranchising, you’re taking advantage of the skills and the entrepreneurial energy of franchisees. The franchisor, in the short run, raises capital by selling the unit, but then ultimately shifts the management to a franchisee, who presumably will do a better job of running it.

Mathews: Refranchising focuses the franchisor on franchising and away from operations. It keeps resources aimed at franchisees, which is the core competency of most franchisors.

Can refranchising hurt franchisees?

Costello: I suppose it could hurt franchisees if they aren’t using their doing due diligence to make sure the purchase is viable and the purchase terms are fair.

I’ve heard that in some recent refranchising efforts, the franchisor was just interested in getting as much as they could for the units to the detriment of the buyer. But at the same time, if the buyer is reading financial statements and paying attention, you wouldn’t think that would be a problem. If you’re buying many, many units, you’re presumably a sophisticated buyer and know what you’re getting into.

Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search