This question was closed without grading. Reason: Other
Sep 14, 2007 12:22
17 yrs ago
1 viewer *
Swedish term

tåla ögats slitage

Swedish to English Marketing Furniture / Household Appliances
The context is about design of rooms etc. that need to
"tåla ögats slitage". I was thinking along the lines of "easy on the eye" in the sense of something you could look at time and time again without tiring of it, i.e. a design that will still look good in the longer term, but would be grateful if someone could confirm I'm on the right track (or that I'm totally wrong or missing a much better alternative). Thanks.

Discussion

E2efour (X) Sep 14, 2007:
I think you are right. Alternatively "never loses its visual appeal", "you never get tired of looking at it etc. Certainly not the nonsensical translation with "wear (and tear) of the eye".

Proposed translations

-1
22 mins

stand the wear and tear of the eye

"Det skall tåla ögats slitage" is the tile of an Undergraduate thesis (Master Thesis in Business Administration (Magisteruppsats från Ekonomprogrammet) from Linköping University. The title of that theis was "officially" translated as follows:

Title:

Immateriella värden & design -eller ”Det skall tåla ögats slitage”
Immaterial value & design -or ”It must withstand the wear and tear of the eye”

Authors Johan Dyrendahl & Sophia Karlsson

http://www.uppsatser.se/uppsats/be5ff38ab2/
http://www.diva-portal.org/liu/abstract.xsql?dbid=2375

the need for ergonomics and flexibility is evident. A piece of furniture must stand the wear and tear of the eye as well as by use. ...
www.hollsten.com/news/icff/0205.htm -
Peer comment(s):

disagree E2efour (X) : Pity the authors of the thesis didn't consult a native speaker. One can, of course, invent new metaphors, but this one sounds too unidiomatic to me.
7 mins
I am simply pointing out to the asker what the context of the Swedish expression is, how can you disagree with that?
Something went wrong...
3 hrs

endures the gaze of time

just had to comment

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2007-09-14 16:05:05 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

your right yourself of course
Peer comment(s):

neutral E2efour (X) : Sounds very poetic, but does time have eyes?
16 hrs
What do we know of time? Or the unidiomatic for that matter?
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search