Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
literatura gris
English translation:
Grey (or gray) literature
Spanish term
literatura gris
Context: "El 77% de los artículos corresponden a publicaciones científicas y 23% a literatura gris".
4 +2 | Grey (or gray) | Yvonne Gallagher |
5 +6 | gray literature | Barbara Cochran, MFA |
Jun 23, 2015 23:39: philgoddard changed "Field" from "Science" to "Other" , "Field (specific)" from "Linguistics" to "Printing & Publishing" , "Field (write-in)" from "technical and scientific publications" to "(none)"
Jul 1, 2015 07:46: Yvonne Gallagher Created KOG entry
Jul 1, 2015 07:47: Yvonne Gallagher changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1300525">Yvonne Gallagher's</a> old entry - "literatura gris"" to ""Grey (or gray)""
Non-PRO (2): philgoddard, Jane Martin
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Grey (or gray)
So, it's really your choice, depending on your target of course
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_literature
http://csulb.libguides.com/graylit
http://libguides.ecu.edu/greylit.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2015-06-24 08:03:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Barbara's answer wasn't there when I started researching this. So, initially I would have though "simple" as well, the usual US/UK spelling divide but when I looked into it it was NOT so simple. Many US institutions/universities use the spelling "grey" for this. Including here
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
http://guides.lib.umich.edu/greyliterature
http://libguides.fau.edu/content.php?pid=500544&sid=4748615
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2015-06-24 08:15:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.greynet.org/greysourceindex.html
http://guides.library.upenn.edu/healthgreylit?hs=a
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 days (2015-07-01 07:45:08 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Glad to have helped...and I learned something as well!
Dear Gallagy: you are absolutely right, it was not so simple. Thank you! |
agree |
Wilsonn Perez Reyes
: Probably because the spelling "gray" can be confused with other types of literature.
1 hr
|
Many thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
Helena Chavarria
: I don't know why more people agree with 'gray', when 'grey' appears to be more common.
8 hrs
|
Many thanks:-) That's the way I see it too.
|
gray literature
agree |
Adoración Bodoque Martínez
12 mins
|
Gracias, Adoración.
|
|
agree |
philgoddard
: Or grey for the UK.
28 mins
|
Thanks, philgoddard
|
|
agree |
Muriel Vasconcellos
: It refers to pamphlets, reports, and other loose resources that are sometimes hard to catalog because the authorship isn't clear. There are different cataloguing rules for gray literature (I worked in a library cataloguing department).
38 mins
|
Thanks, Muriel.
|
|
agree |
Fabio M. Caldas
1 hr
|
Gracias, Fabio.
|
|
agree |
Danik 2014
1 hr
|
Thanks, Danik 2014.
|
|
neutral |
Helena Chavarria
: You don't provide any references that justify a confidence level of 5.
8 hrs
|
Sure I did-google.
|
|
agree |
Jaime Hyland
: Sometimes (just sometimes) references are superfluous.
9 hrs
|
Thanks, Jaime.
|
|
neutral |
Yvonne Gallagher
: Refs. are not "superfluous" here at all imo. but rather prove it's not as simple as it looks.//the fact is that "grey literature" is far more commonly used, even in the US
9 hrs
|
It's no opinion-It's a fact. Hence, the "5".
|
Reference comments
Grey Literature
The Fourth International Conference on Grey Literature (GL '99) in Washington, DC, in October 1999 defined grey literature as follows: "That which is produced on all levels of government, academics, business and industry in print and electronic formats, but which is not controlled by commercial publishers."
http://www.greylit.org/about
Grey literature is generally defined as academic literature that is not formally published. It is an expanding field in library and information science that deals with the supply and demand side of publications not controlled by commercial publishing.
Research in this field of information has been systematically documented and archived via the International Conference Series on Grey Literature (1993, Vol.1)...(2014, Vol.16) and The Grey Journal (2005, Vol.1)...(2014, Vol.10) a flagship journal for the grey literature community. On 16 May 2014, the Pisa Declaration on Policy Development for Grey Literature Resources was ratified and published.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_literature
http://www.greylit.org/publishers/list?letter=B
Muchas gracias, Helena. |
agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: There's simple Googling and then there's (cross-referencing) research. Some people don't seem to know the difference:-)
12 hrs
|
You're so right! Thank you, Gallagy ;-)
|
neutral |
Yvonne Gallagher
: En > Sp glossary and doesn't answer Asker's question
4 hrs
|
Discussion