Daryo Oct 13, 2019:

Thanks! You would expect it to work that way round, but it's better to be sure.

Correction:

Content providers do their best to stop Smart Alecks from filling their websites with other people's content by displaying "stolen" content in iframes.

Cécilia Langarica (asker) Oct 12, 2019:

This expression appears in two sentences, in the "Authorized Hosts" section, but first, we know that the third-party web resources are the one framing the web applications, as you can see here:

"Use the authorized hosts settings to define third-party web resources that are allowed to either embed (frame) the PME web applications, or to which the PME web applications can redirect requests."

So it's about embed the web applications, or frame them.

I didn't find an adequate synonym for "embed", (intégrer), to translate "frame", but "afficher dans un cadre" seems to be the correct one.

Daryo Oct 8, 2019:

@ Cécilia Allain More context is needed, to be 100% of the intended meaning.

Namely, just from the quoted segment it is not clear who is doing the "framing" and who is providing the content being "framed" - you would be superficially tempted to think that the content found on these hosts is "framed" within this Web application by Web de Schneider, but that wouldn't make any sense. It ought to be the other way round.

The one that needs authorisation (so that it "can" frame) is the one "doing the framing" NOT the one providing the content "being framed".

Content providers do their best from stopping Smart Alecks from filling their websites with other people's content by displaying "stolen" content in iframes.

so it should be

les URL des hôtes permis d'afficher dans un cadre / capable de transclusion

BTW these "frames" are part of HTLM coding (web design) nothing to do with "frames" in the TCP/IP protocol