GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17:08 Nov 30, 2015 |
English to Polish translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D. United States Local time: 02:05 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | zaniedbanie wspólne z porównaniem stopnia winy stron / ... z określeniem stopnia przyczynienia [...] |
| ||
3 | zaniedbania porównawcze |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Differences Between Comparative Negligence and Contributory Negligence |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
comparative negligence zaniedbanie wspólne z porównaniem stopnia winy stron / ... z określeniem stopnia przyczynienia [...] Explanation: zaniedbanie wspólne z porównaniem/określeniem stopnia winy stron zaniedbanie wspólne z określeniem stopnia przyczynienia stron do powstania szkody https://www.google.pl/#q=porównanie stopnia winy obu stron https://www.google.pl/#q=Stopień przyczynienia do szkody -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2015-11-30 19:41:00 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- KC Art. 362. Jeżeli poszkodowany przyczynił się do powstania lub zwiększenia szkody, obowiązek jej naprawienia ulega odpowiedniemu zmniejszeniu stosownie do okoliczności, a zwłaszcza do stopnia winy obu stron. http://www.arslege.pl/przyczynienie-sie-poszkodowanego-do-po... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
comparative negligence zaniedbania porównawcze Explanation: IMHO -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 35 mins (2015-11-30 17:44:07 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Dotyczy współwinności poszkodowanego w wypadku -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 38 mins (2015-11-30 17:46:35 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Zaniedbanie czysto porównawcze W normie zaniedbania czysto porównawczego sędzia lub zespół sędziowski ustala, ile winy w wypadku ponosi każdy uczestnik zdarzenia, a następnie adekwatnie dzieli sumy odszkodowania. Na przykład, jeśli osobę uznano w 40% winną swoich własnych obrażeń, pozostałe strony poniosą jedynie odpowiedzialność za wypłacenie 60% sumy odszkodowania powoda. Ta suma wywodzi się z części winy ustalonej dla każdej z nich. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 39 mins (2015-11-30 17:47:24 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- http://www.piotrwachowski.com/zaniedbanie.html -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 46 mins (2015-11-30 17:54:32 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- opcja: niedbalstwo porównawcze -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 7 hrs (2015-12-01 00:57:44 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Definicja: According to this doctrine the amount of damages awarded is proportional to each party's level of negligence. http://en.termwiki.cn/EN/comparative_negligence_₁ cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
1 hr peer agreement (net): +1 |
Reference: Differences Between Comparative Negligence and Contributory Negligence Reference information: The fundamental difference between the legal concepts of comparative and contributory negligence is that comparative negligence seeks to compensate the injured party at least for some part of his or her injuries, while contributory negligence is a total bar to any damage award to the plaintiff. In both instances, the plaintiff's negligence must be proved by the defendant. The difference boils down to how the plaintiff's ultimate recovery (if any) is impacted by the plaintiff's own negligence. A further difference is that contributory negligence originated in common law, while comparative negligence is a statutory creation in jurisdictions that abolished the antiquated common law predecessor. http://www.attorneys.com/personal-injury/differences-between... Contributory negligence essentially says that if you contribute to your own injury, you can't hold anyone else responsible for it. In a pure contributory negligence system, if you are even one percent at fault and you suffer hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages, you can't collect any compensation from the person who is 99 percent at fault. If you are determined to have been negligent, even a little bit, you get nothing. This is a pretty harsh rule, but it remains in place in a handful of states (check out the chart below to see which states still follow the contributory negligence rule). Comparative fault is different from contributory negligence. Under a comparative negligence rule, the first assessment involves the amount of fault that belongs to each person (for causing the accident or injury). For instance, say one driver ran a red light and the other turned left too soon, right before a car accident. Both of these parties were negligent, and each contributed to the accident. The factfinder in that case (the judge or jury) would have to determine how much fault each of them contributed. For instance, perhaps the person who ran the red light was the one who was primarily responsible, and the other driver just contributed a bit with his own negligent action. The driver who ran the red might be found to be 60 percent at fault, and the driver who turned illegally, 40 percent responsible. http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/personal-injury/shared-b... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.