English term
below/above average
In the sections that follow, please rate the usability of the document according to the following rating system:
1 - Poor
2 - Below Average
3 - Average
4 - Above Average
5 - Excellent
Примеры вопросов:
Is the purpose of this manual clearly stated?
Does the document fulfill the purpose?
Is the audience clearly defined?
Does the document meet audience needs?
Do the instructions follow the exact sequence of steps?
Is the organization appropriate and logical?
Are the headings specific and helpful?
Is the Table of Contents complete and useful?
Do explanations enable readers to understand what to do?
...
Вариант "ниже/выше среднего" не нравится, потому что он выглядит более чем странно как ответ на большинство вопросов анкеты.
Спасибо
| 4 +1 | плохо/хорошо |
Svetlana Gladkova
|
| 4 +6 | ниже/выше среднего |
Igor Savenkov
|
| 4 +2 | неудовлетворительно/хорошо |
maria-russ
|
| 4 | слабо/хорошо |
Vadim Pogulyaev
|
| 3 | скорее да/нет (плохо/хорошо) |
Anna Astar
|
Non-PRO (1): erika rubinstein
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Russian Federation
Trustworthy, Accurate, Efficient
Native in: Russian 
Works in: English to Russian, Russian to English, Russian
плохо/хорошо
Russian Federation
Ph.D. 15+ years in technical translation
Native in: Russian
Works in: English to Russian
ниже/выше среднего
| agree |
Angela Greenfield
3 mins
|
|
Спасибо, Анджела
|
|
| agree |
IronDog
15 mins
|
|
Спасибо
|
|
| agree |
Anna Fominykh
: with discussion entry "Насколько ясно..."
19 mins
|
|
Спасибо
|
|
| agree |
erika rubinstein
35 mins
|
|
Спасибо
|
|
| agree |
Aleksey Chervinskiy
10 hrs
|
|
Спасибо
|
|
| agree |
tschingite
16 hrs
|
Sweden
...with my head and heart...
Native in: Russian
Works in: English to Russian, Russian to English, German to Russian, and 2 more.
скорее да/нет (плохо/хорошо)
слабо/хорошо
More than 15 years of experience
Native in: Russian 
Works in: English to Russian, Swedish to Russian
неудовлетворительно/хорошо
1-плохо
2 - неудовлетворительно
3 - удовлетворительно
4 - хорошо
5 - отлично
Просто она всем знакома и понятна с детства.
Discussion
Пришлось немного переделать анкету.
"Пожалуйста, отметьте насколько вы согласны или не согласны со следующими высказываниями (1 - Не согласен ... 5 - Полностью согласен):"
И затем все вопросы в виде утвеждения.
2 - Недостаточно
3 - удовлетворительно
4 - хорошо
5 - отлично
Ээээ, несколько плохо сочетается формулировка многих вопросов с rating system.
Напр., "Does the document fulfill the purpose?" - Ответ: "Poor". :-)))
R U shore U R pore?
2 - Ниже среднего
3 - более-менеее хорошо
4 - Выше среднего
5 - отлично
Насколько документ отвечает своему назначению?
Насколько четко очерчена аудитория, для которой предназначен документ?
и т.д.