Mar 15, 2007 12:32
17 yrs ago
8 viewers *
English term
It is not clear yet whether such phenomena would be observed in patients with non-tumor diseases
English
Medical
Medical (general)
Is the grammar is OK in the following sentence: "It is not clear yet whether such phenomena would be observed in patients with non-tumor diseases"?
I mean"would" or "will" should be used?
Thanks in advance!
I mean"would" or "will" should be used?
Thanks in advance!
Responses
Change log
Mar 15, 2007 12:39: NancyLynn changed "Term asked" from "Is the grammar is OK?" to "It is not clear yet whether such phenomena would be observed in patients with non-tumor diseases"
Responses
+9
9 mins
English term (edited):
is the grammar is ok?
Selected
Both, it depends!
Either could be fine, it just depends on what you are trying to actually say!
If you are trying to say that such-and-such a treatment is being given, and we don't know if the results are going to be visible or not, then you need 'will'
But if you are talking in a more hypothetical situation: if we were to give this treatment to these patients, we don't know whether these signs are going to be visible (or not), then you need 'would'
(BTW, I would stick with 'observable', I believe it is the correct jargon for this type of text.)
If you are trying to say that such-and-such a treatment is being given, and we don't know if the results are going to be visible or not, then you need 'will'
But if you are talking in a more hypothetical situation: if we were to give this treatment to these patients, we don't know whether these signs are going to be visible (or not), then you need 'would'
(BTW, I would stick with 'observable', I believe it is the correct jargon for this type of text.)
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you very much!"
+1
4 mins
English term (edited):
is the grammar is ok?
It looks
okay to me but I would change it around to look like this:
It is still unclear whether such phenomena would be evident in patients with non-tumor diseases.
But that is just me. You may get some better answers
It is still unclear whether such phenomena would be evident in patients with non-tumor diseases.
But that is just me. You may get some better answers
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Ledja
: I had a inkling that "observe" here didn't quite fit. "being evident" seems to make sense.
1 hr
|
+3
5 mins
English term (edited):
is the grammar is ok?
It is not yet clear whether such phenomena can be observed in patients with non-tumor diseases.
This is what I would say instead. HTH.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
NancyLynn
0 min
|
agree |
writeaway
: but all answers are just conjecture without seeing the actual context.
17 mins
|
neutral |
Richard Benham
: I think this slightly changes the sense.
1 hr
|
agree |
Anna Maria Augustine (X)
1 hr
|
neutral |
Tony M
: I agree with RB; this introduces a nuance of meaning that _might_ be significant
2 hrs
|
-1
6 mins
English term (edited):
is the grammar is ok?
Is it gramatically correct?
"would " is the right usage.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2007-03-15 12:43:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Yet it is not clear whether such phenomena would be evident in patients with non-tumor diseases.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2007-03-15 12:43:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Yet it is not clear whether such phenomena would be evident in patients with non-tumor diseases.
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Tony M
: I don't think we have enough context to definitely choose one or the other (and certainly, neither would be grammatically INcorrect); however, your re-positioning of 'yet' at the beginning of the sentence completely changes the sense of it!
15 mins
|
+2
1 hr
it is not clear yet whether such phenomena are to be observed in patients with non-tumor diseases
This skirts around the question raised by Tony. But the best solution would be to decide what you actually mean, and say that!
Something went wrong...