Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
a priori
English translation:
intuitively
Spanish term
a priori
Rafael Álvarez, más conocido por el gran público como El Brujo, vuelve a Valencia con una nueva obra, titulada El Testigo, basada en la fuerza y comicidad con que el actor envuelve sus monólogos. En este nuevo reto escénico que Álvarez plantea a los espectadores, el incombustible artista narra la imaginaria biografía de Miguel Pantalón, cantaor gaditano, excéntrico y genial, una personalidad, que, **a priori** y sobre el escenario, se ajusta como anillo al dedo a las cualidades actorales del intérprete cordobés.
3 +5 | intuitively | Patricia Rosas |
3 | in reality/in truth/in fact | bcsantos |
5 -2 | a priori (is a latin term) | Constantinos Faridis (X) |
Sep 15, 2021 18:07: Nikki Graham changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): Richard McDorman, Evans (X), Nikki Graham
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
intuitively
1 : by reasoning from definitions formed or principles assumed : DEDUCTIVELY
2 : without examination or analysis : PRESUMPTIVELY
3 : independently or experience : INTUITIVELY
My sense from the context is that 3 would work best. Good luck!
agree |
Graham Allen-Rawlings
2 mins
|
thank you!
|
|
agree |
Mariana Solanet
7 mins
|
thank you, too!
|
|
agree |
Evans (X)
: yes, I think this works here. The French tend to bandy this Latin term about with gay abandon, and it is usually best to express it differently in English. I haven't come across its use so often in Spanish.
27 mins
|
interesting! A client fr Barcelona was bandying about "a posteriori" and I protested! He finally gave in ;-)
|
|
agree |
Andrew Campbell
29 mins
|
thank you!
|
|
agree |
James A. Walsh
5 hrs
|
thank you, James!
|
in reality/in truth/in fact
neutral |
Richard McDorman
: I do not think that this is what "a priori" means, even when construed loosely.
2 hrs
|
a priori (is a latin term)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 λεπτά (2010-10-19 14:26:08 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
alcuni dicono che poiché si tratta di un termine leggale, lo lasciamo solo per i contesti legali. Ma non è cosi. Molti termini legali vengon prestati e usati anche in conversazioni colloquiali, com'è il caso di a priori che viene usato per fino da noi, in greco non solo in contesti legali.
Thanks, Constantino - I know it's a Latin term but I have only seen it used in a legal context and leaving it as 'a priori' doesn´t make much sense to me :) |
Hi Constantino - I'm sorry, I don't understand your note very well - I am only familiar with English, Spanish, Catalan and French! |
disagree |
Lydia De Jorge
: Your entry makes absolutely no sense and to boot you post part of your answer in Italian!
1 hr
|
disagree |
Richard McDorman
: While the term is obviously a Latin one, it is used in high-register English prose. I am disagreeing with your response, however, because it is incomprehensible.
2 hrs
|
Discussion