Richard Stephen Apr 8, 2011:

I beg your pardon The argument is indeed about the use of "transport". That was the (only) reason I disagreed.

petrolhead Apr 8, 2011:

Ethic The argument here is not about the use of "transport" that is not correct. True! I HAVE realized that immediately and offered correct translation in line two immediately below. A neutral comment to point this out would have sufficed, without questioning my judgement on the selection of sources (this is what my comment on 'fleet' refers to).
2. You answers based around "van" are incorrect because the context requires another term accepted by the industry (not just 'capacity' that is too general and could mean anything really, including payload) that is different from 'van'. I guess these are reasonable grounds to disagree.

Richard Stephen Apr 8, 2011:

Ethic Nor is it very ethical to disagree with someone else's answer simply on the grounds that they disagreed with yours. My answer may not be the only possibility, but it is not incorrect - yours is!

Richard Stephen Apr 8, 2011:

Your primary answer was 'transport' and this is obviously false - why don't you just concede the point? It makes no difference what you write in the explanation when the answer itself it incorrect. Do you want to explain away an incorrect answer?

petrolhead Apr 8, 2011:

Transport Clearly, reading line 2 of my entry is beyond you. Let me bow out at this point.

Richard Stephen Apr 8, 2011:

Transport is the term we are talking about. The term fleet does not appear in your answer. And you cannot call a vehicle a "transport"!

petrolhead Apr 8, 2011:

High-Cube fleet Question to Richard Stephen:
"The UK's largest High-Cube fleet for bulk transport ... "
does the noun "fleet" refer to "a service" or to vehicles?
http://www.tdg.eu.com/high-cube-network.asp