Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Serbian term or phrase:
greška ujednačenog ocenjivanja
English translation:
error in standardized performance evaluation
Added to glossary by
Bogdan Petrovic
Nov 7, 2019 21:47
4 yrs ago
3 viewers *
Serbian term
greška ujednačenog ocenjivanja
Serbian to English
Law/Patents
Human Resources
ocenjivanje radnog ucinka
Navedeno ukazuje na eventualni početak „standardizacije“ procesa ocenjivanja u skladu sa novim modelom, a koji pokazuje eventualnu grešku ujednačenog ocenjivanja.
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +1 | error in standardized performance evaluation | Lidija Djujic (X) |
3 | uniform evaluation error | Dragana Samardžijević |
3 -1 | equitable assessment error | Elio Verbanac |
Proposed translations
+1
39 days
Selected
error in standardized performance evaluation
Standardized Performance Evaluation Method
A common standardized performance evaluation system contains a highly structured rating scale. This rating scale has predetermined criteria normally categorized by ranking employee skills and abilities by a numeric system. For example, ratings can range from 1 through 5. In this method, 1 may be unsatisfactory and 5 may be excellent. Standardized employee performance evaluation methods frequently take the guess work out of performing an evaluation. Methods are largely straightforward and unambiguous in their calculative assessments.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/standardized-performance-eva...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 39 days (2019-12-16 23:29:59 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Standardized performance evaluation is mostly based on rating scales and checklists that remain popular, despite their inherent flaws.
They entail an assessor providing a subjective assessment of an individual's performance based on a scale effectively ranging from good to bad or on a checklist of characteristics. Typically, basic criteria such as dependability, attitude, and attendance are listed. For the rating scale, the evaluator simply checks a box beside each factor to indicate, for example, excellent, good, fair, or poor.
All this makes standardized performance evaluation superficial.
A common standardized performance evaluation system contains a highly structured rating scale. This rating scale has predetermined criteria normally categorized by ranking employee skills and abilities by a numeric system. For example, ratings can range from 1 through 5. In this method, 1 may be unsatisfactory and 5 may be excellent. Standardized employee performance evaluation methods frequently take the guess work out of performing an evaluation. Methods are largely straightforward and unambiguous in their calculative assessments.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/standardized-performance-eva...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 39 days (2019-12-16 23:29:59 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Standardized performance evaluation is mostly based on rating scales and checklists that remain popular, despite their inherent flaws.
They entail an assessor providing a subjective assessment of an individual's performance based on a scale effectively ranging from good to bad or on a checklist of characteristics. Typically, basic criteria such as dependability, attitude, and attendance are listed. For the rating scale, the evaluator simply checks a box beside each factor to indicate, for example, excellent, good, fair, or poor.
All this makes standardized performance evaluation superficial.
Example sentence:
However, since so many other business and HR processes use performance evaluation data as input, it's important to ensure employee performance ratings are consistent and fair.
Standardized measures have a commonality in errors which is naturally absent among measures targeted to each circumstance.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Hvala!"
-1
1 day 12 hrs
equitable assessment error
"Equitable assessment" je uobičajena sintagma u kontekstu ocjenjivanja radnika i učenika.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enHR752HR753&ei=uJ...
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enHR752HR753&ei=uJ...
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Daryo
: "уобичајена синтагма" је крајње неубедљив "доказ" // заправо не доказује апсолутно ништа (осим статистичке учесталости) - поготову када је тачно значење изворног израза магловито.
6 hrs
|
5 days
uniform evaluation error
Nešto iz HR oblasti:
"The Uniform Evaluation Service exists to assist you in leveraging departmental resources."
http://www.iapmo.org/hidden/building-official
Deo sa "greškom" mi nije najjasniji, ali mislim da bi ovakva formulacija ipak pokrila najveći broj mogućih konteksta.
"The Uniform Evaluation Service exists to assist you in leveraging departmental resources."
http://www.iapmo.org/hidden/building-official
Deo sa "greškom" mi nije najjasniji, ali mislim da bi ovakva formulacija ipak pokrila najveći broj mogućih konteksta.
Something went wrong...