Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

held

English answer:

in the possession of/in the hands of/kept by/with

Added to glossary by Terry Burgess
Nov 8, 2007 22:58
16 yrs ago
15 viewers *
English term

held

English Bus/Financial Law: Contract(s)
I can't quite understand what the word ,,held'' means in the following text:

,,NYBL § 492(1) requires any entity engaging "in the business of a sales finance company in this state to obtain a license therefor...from the Superintendent, as provided in this article." NYBL § 491(7) defines a "sales finance company" to include any entity "engaged, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring retail installment contracts... [entered into in this state]."

Any person who violates or participates in the violation of NYBL § 492(1) is guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, will be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned for not more than six months or both, in the discretion of the court. It is important to note that NYBL is silent regarding the continued validity and enforceability of retail installment contracts *held* by an unlicensed sales finance company.''

Could anybody help me with this one?
Change log

Nov 12, 2007 00:25: Terry Burgess Created KOG entry

Responses

+4
4 mins
Selected

in the possession of/in the hands of

That's as I understand it.
Luck!

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 mins (2007-11-08 23:13:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Grzegorz:
Thanks to Toby, you now have another good option: "being kept by".
Peer comment(s):

agree T o b i a s : or 'being kept by"
1 min
Now that one escaped me! Thanks, Toby
agree Alejandra Hozikian
3 mins
Thanks, Alejandra:-)
agree niczav
5 mins
Thanks, niczav:-)
agree orientalhorizon
5 hrs
Thanks, orientalhorizon:-)
agree V_Nedkov : what I understand is that NYBL can't take a side for contracts that these unlicensed sales finance companies have.
10 hrs
Thanks again, "V":-)
disagree Tatiana N. (X) : the actual contract papers can be in the possession of whoever which does not create standing in the person of the holder, mere possession means nothing
23 hrs
:-)
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thanks a lot!"
+4
26 mins

contracts *with* an unlicensed...

or owned by
Peer comment(s):

agree Richard Benham : Contracts aren't really owned or in the possession of anybody. The issue could be grandfathering: whether contracts already in existence (one party to which was an unlicensed loan co.) before the law came into effect would still be enforceabe afterwards.
49 mins
agree orientalhorizon
5 hrs
agree ErichEko ⟹⭐
6 hrs
agree Tatiana N. (X) : agree with Richard - it might be about grandfathering (in this case, rather about assignment of K to an unlicensed company), or but about lapsing of license in the original party to K
23 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search